Angelina Chun 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9#
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons.

To begin with, field trip is conducive to help student get better comprehension of what they learned.When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory.There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems.On the contrary, field trip provide students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems.Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done.Therefore, field trip is of great impotence for students.To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently,it inspired me a lot.After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard.That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again,it proves how important the field trip is for students.To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help student to understand the knowledge better.

Plus,field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly,we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study.Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, I have to say I love auditing and I made myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me.Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom.Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom

Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip.They said that field trip in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government.It just takes some time.But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage over leaning in the classroom.That is irreplaceable.Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom.

To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom.
2016-05-13 09:21:50 来自 托福作文咩
评论
1 楼
1.最后一段第二行 these 打错啦。 2.每句话句号结束后,打一个空格,不然一放到word里看全是红色波浪线...... 3.因为我们分段完成的作文,总字数超了。(我也是)在改精简点就好了。
2016-05-13 09:37
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 好好好!我再修改修改谢谢么么~
2016-05-13 09:40
评论
3 楼
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is[这里可以用一些短语啊my point is感觉表述不太大气] field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons. To begin with, field trip is conducive to help[ing/to是介词] student[s] get better comprehension of what they learned. When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory. There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems. On the contrary, field trip provide[s] students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems. Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater[master] the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done. Therefore, field trip is of great impotence[importance] for students. To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently, it inspired me a lot. After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard. That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again, it proves how important the field trip is for students. To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help[ing] student to understand the knowledge better. Plus, field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly, we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study. Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, [和上一段表达一样可以换其他形式]I have to say I love auditing and I made[这一句前后时态不一致] myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me. Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve [宾语呢] dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom. Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip. They said that field trip [宾从没谓语] in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government. It just takes some time. But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage[s] over leaning in the classroom. That is irreplaceable. Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom. To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they [have] learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom. 字数确实好多600+再精简一点
2016-05-13 20:15
评论
4 楼
评论 3楼 好谢谢惠普!么么哒❤️
2016-05-13 20:25
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
As society develops, the increasing correlation between education and students’ personal success calls for improvement and innovation of education. Some who stick at traditional teaching methods insist on their students studying in the classroom, while other come up with a different kind of field trips. Personally, I think conducting field study may be better for students. Here are my reasons. First of all, field trips contribute to better understanding of the knowledge gained in class. Textbooks and handouts might be the only resources students could refer to if they just study indoors. Field study, removing the boundaries of classrooms, could allow students have a closer look at what they have learned in class. The appearance, sound, taste, texture and other aspects of an object could render a laudable service for students to get a better perception of it, and thus facilitate their learning. For instance, my history teacher who intended to teach us about the old ramparts in our city, took us to the suburb of Nanjing, where we watched and touched (got permissions already) the weathered stones. Standing on the old walls, we had a vivid knowledge of the structure and the materials they used. As we can see, field trips enable students to fell the authentic objects and to cultivate their insights. And no matter how graphical a picture in a book might be, it will never leave such a great impression on students. Thus, I believe that field trips are of greater significance as to study. Next, field trips are more likely to arouse students' curiosity of a subject. As the saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If field trips could stimulate students' delight in study, then field trips outweigh classroom learning. For instance, I have participated in a photography course and I found the theories of composition and color to be dull. One day our professor took us students to a garden with breath-taking landscapes. All of my classmates experimented with different camera settings to get the optimal image effect. Even when it was dark, we continued to try long exposures and light painting tirelessly. From then on, no classmates have played hooky or dozed off at class. As you can see, if students are given the chance to practice outdoors, they could gain hands-on experience and thus get inspired by the exploration. I guess most people may have the same experience. Therefore, I believe that, compared with studying in the classroom, field trips are better. Some people argue that studying in the classroom is better because students could concentrate on what they are learning when they stay in the classroom, and thus could learn systematically. In fact, students will fail to be absorbed if they feel bored, not to mention their solid grasp of knowledge. Admittedly, students will become too excited to think straight during field trips, but this problem could be solved if their teachers could guide them right there. In conclusion, field study, with its efficiency of maintaining students' interest and facilitating their absorption of knowledge, outshines in-class teaching method. Thus, I believe it is better for students.
Education is the cornerstone of the developing society, where there are amounts of people fixing their attention on and spending time and money on, thus, leading the style of the education to some unprecedented directions. For a long time, society has mixed views concerning the education. Making a comparison between study in the classroom and in the field, for instance, which one would be better? From my perspective, study in the field is my favor. To begin with, earnest study is conducive to students to grasp knowledge. Students, study in the classroom, could only absorb knowledge from books or handouts. However, when study in the field, where students have access to sense things from a more comprehensive coverage-- appearance, sounds, tastes, odors, touches, etc., they will make breakthroughs on the restrictions from the rooms but not keep a stasis on the books. A lecture concerning biology, when the professor ought to introduce students various botanies, can be a case in point. Only if they undertake the course in the wild place, students could learn things in their flesh, go sightseeing with the figures of the plants, smells the fragrant odors of flowers and make a comparison between divergent environments. The study like this would be more compelling and vivid than the study in the classroom could be, which impress students more, hence, students understand more. Thus, study in the filed would be better than study in the building. Further, the field study would inspire the learning interest of the student. The motto goes that interest is the greatest teacher, which means, if the filed study could generate students the interest to study, thus, this style would be better the study in the classroom. I remember a lesson, when the rain ceased to precipitate, in the primary school, the teacher advocated us to be out of the class to bathe the fresh air and the attractive scenery. In that moment, I felt everything in the nature was fascinating to me so that my affection on the nature lesson, which seemed to be an adventure for me, spontaneously promoted. At present, although the time flies, the details of the class are still imprinted in my brain because of the interest but not some fatigue classes in the concrete blocks. This case from my memory is in the point that we would venture in the nature if we go out, hence the interest would be formed. It is universally acknowledged that countless people have the same experience as I had in my primary school. Needless to contrast with the study in the class, study in the filed is better to the students. Some people will not frown to the study in the classroom because of their thoughts that this style would be better to educate the student. For the sake that the risk, some incidents concerning safety might happen, of field study, thus, study in the classroom seems comparatively safer. But the truth is that there is no evidence showing edges of the classroom on safety to the study in the field. Administration, from the teacher, matters much with the security- i.e., a bad one would not guarantee the absolute safety. Thus, relatively, field study has the incomparable advantages, in terms of the education, over the study in the classroom. All in all, study in the field could not only render teh students comprehend knowledge better, hence the education, but also inspire the interest of the student to study. All these factors would make a difference on the aim of the education.
Homework 1 百年大计,教育为本。随着社会的发展,人们对教育的关注越来越多,投入的时间和金钱比重也越来越大,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直也来,社会上都不乏涉及教育的讨论。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学的知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助于书本,显得枯燥乏味,效果也不好。但如果可以将我们的课堂放到教室之外,学生可以摆脱教室和书本的限制,通过外观、声音、味道等感官近距离接触所学的东西,这非常有助于学生对知识的理解。例如语文课上《醉翁亭记》,如果老师仅仅是对学生讲解书本上所写的文字内容的话,学生并不一定能够很好的理解欧阳修文字中描写的景色,只能空凭想象。但如果这节课可以实地到醉翁亭去上,那就完全不一样了,老师可以对照课文将周围的景物一一讲解,非常有利于学生对课文中的景色以及作者思想的理解。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。初中的时候我们的化学课上,老师带我们去实验室上课,我们得以真正实践那些在我们课本上出现的实验,并观察它们的现象,就像一次探险。这样的实践对于我的帮助非常大,我深深地爱上了化学这门课。从初中到高中,化学都是我学的最好的学科。相比之下,对那些只在教室里纸上谈兵的课程我就不是那么喜欢,学的也不是那么好。这个例子说明,我们去实验室上化学课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有些人可能认为在教室学习必实地学习对孩子的教育更好,他们觉得实地学习可能会造成学生完全抛弃书本理论知识的学习。事实上,只要老师能够良好的结合书本与实践,这是完全可以避免的。而实地学习具有教室学习无可比拟的优点,所以这对孩子的教育更有利。 简言之,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都更益于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 Homework 2 As is known to all, education is the bed rock of a country’s long term development. With the development of society, people begin to pay more and more attention on education. An increasing investment of time and fund has also been spent on education. This encourages reforms and innovations on the ways of education. There has always been plentiful discussion about education. For instance, which is a better way to educate our children, to study in the classroom or to go on a field study? From my own opinion, field study does more benefits on students’ education. Here are my reasons. To begin with, field study is conductive to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Studying in the classroom, students can only learn with the aid of text book. It seems dull and boring, as well as bad effect. But if we put our lesson to the outside, students can get rid of the classroom’s constraint. They may touch the things they’ve learned through their senses, such as appearances, sounds and tastes. It contributes their understanding a lot. For instance, a Chinese class which is teaching “Account of Inebriate Pavilion”, if teachers only read the text book to the students, students may not get a good comprehension on the beautiful scene and Ouyang Xiu’s thoughts indicated in the article. They may only depend on their poor imagination. However, if the class is taught in Inebriate Pavilion, there would be a totally difference. Teachers can make every scenery written in the article to match the mountains, rivers around. It benefits the students’ understanding a lot. This way is more vivid than classroom based only on textbook and impress students more. Consequently, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Next, field study is more likely to arouse one’s curiosity of studying. As the old saying, interest is the best teacher. If the field study performance better on exciting the students’ interests, this method benefits children more than studying in the classroom. During my junior time, my chemistry teacher always put classes in the lab so that we could practice those experiments on our textbook and observe the phenomena of them. Experiment made everything in the chemistry class like an exploration. This practice helped me a lot. I got fascinated with chemistry. From my junior to senior high, chemistry was my best subject. I always got a full score. Relatively, I was not interest with those class without field study. I performance fair on those ones. This example illustrates that field study can truly improve students’ interests in study. I believe that many of the students have the same experience with me. Therefore, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study does more benefits on children’s education. Some people may believe that studying in the classroom has more benefits on students’ education than field study. They hold the opinion that field study has possibility to cause children to override theoretical learning. As a matter of fact, if the teacher can combine textbook learning and practice well, this circumstance can be avoided. Field study has advantages which studying in the classroom can’t compare with so that field study does more help on students’ learning than studying in the classroom. Briefly, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. It also innovates their interest on study better and pull up their activity on study. These are more beneficial to realize the purpose of knowledge’s spreading through education. Consequently, it contributes a lot to children’s education.
【作业2】 With the remarkable progress of people’s living standard, getting a good quality of education seems to be a very important thing, as education accounts for the knowledge acquired now but also influence the ability performed in the future. When it comes to the way to educate children, there are usually two approaches: to study by going field trips or to study in classroom. As for me, I prefer to learn knowledge in a more practical way such as field trips rather than learning in classroom. And there are some reasons and examples to illustrate my point of view. First and foremost, studying by field trips is a good way of cultivating interest. Take myself as an example. When I was in middle school, I took a field trip in a biology class to take a close look at the plants; the plants are varied in different shapes , functions and sizes, which are very interesting to discover. This trip, however, made myself interested in plants and even shaped my career life. Currently I worked as a nutritionist assistant, for I found my interest in biology in the field trip ten years ago. Besides, field trip does better in stripping up one's inquisitiveness about knowledge. It would be a very good chance for people to corporate theory with way practice. In other words, learning knowledge by taking field trip enables students to learn knowledge in different aspects and learn it deeply; field trip is a good way to portray interior factors to allow people to get to know things better or even become interested in things. Last time when I was in sophomore, my art history professor required us to finish a research paper about comprehending Renaissance art style and technology. In order to gave us a better way to understand the masterpieces, he firstly worked us through all the basic drawing theories, then he took us to the national museum to see the exhibition of Renaissance art. During the exhibition, we had a precious chance to take a very look at the masterpieces by many famous artists, which was very helpful for us to understand the drawing style, material and technology. This case demonstrates that many things could be felt and understood only by experience and practice, therefore field trip is definitely a good choice to cultivate interest and learn things deeply. Admittedly, field trip can be transformed into an obstacle if students go out for study too often. To be precise, it is easier for students to be distracted by other factors happened around than to concentrate on the knowledge discovering, which may finally decrease the study efficiency. In other words, field trip, though, as a way of learning things deeply and comprehensively, could also influence students' learning process in an inefficient way. However, learning in the classroom would not have such a problem of distraction. Therefore it would be an optimal solution to corporate field trip with basic in-class session to acquire knowledge. To put it in a nutshell, clearly justified through above-mentioned reasons and examples, students are worth taking field trips to acquire knowledge than learning only through lessons in classroom, for the field trips enable students to have a better understanding of knowledge and also cultivate interest to shape their future lives.
Centenary progress bases on education. With the development of society, people pay more attention to education and spend more time and money on it, which make eduction creative and evolutionary constantly. As always, discussion relating to education is abundant. For instance, which way, going on field trips is better for children’s education and staying in the classroom at school, is better one on education. As the point of my view, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. There are two reasons as given below. In the first place, going on field trips is conducive to students to better understand their knowledge. Students can only study with books and references on course, conversely, people can break the limit of classes by going on field trips, and get close and more clearly observe what they learn through several aspects, including appearance, sound, smell and feel, instead of staying in books. For instance, in an art class, the teacher organizes her students to go outdoors to draw from nature. At that time, students can personally experience the scene and observe things around there. As a result, these experiences enable students to draw their works well, meantime, and develop their appropriations of the kind thesis of masterpieces. In addition, field-trip study does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about learning subjects. There is a common saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If it can arouse students' enthusiasm by studying on field trips, the way will do better on education of students. I do remember that at a rainy afternoon, we followed the teacher and got out of a biology course to observe changes of organism. I was so surprised about what I found and realized how amazing the biological world was. After then, biology lesson always could attract my attention to study deeply and constantly. Now, although the time just went by, the scene seemed like happened yesterday. Compared with dull books, fields study can bring more fun, and arouse students' inquisitiveness about knowledge. There is another point that some people believe that staying in the classroom at school is better for students than going on field trips. After all, there exist some danger outside. As a matter of fact, we hasn't got the evidence of students' perfect safety in classroom, which mostly depends on teachers' arrangements and managements, and the problem of attention is guided by the way of imparting. If a teacher has some bugs on his managements, students’ safety can not be guaranteed, even though they are in classroom. Conversely, field study shows incomparable advantages better for students' education. In brief, field study is conducive to better understanding what students learn, and arousing their interest of study, spurring students‘ enthusiasm. All of these benefit the educational goal of imparting knowledge. Therefore, it shows more helpful about education.