HazelY 朗播_韩雪林老师 老师提问:
10-14
#召唤陪练狮# 老师好~请教以下三个问题:
①“significantly compounding”V.S.“significant in compounding” (我可以感觉到significantly compounding“是对的,可是我不知道为什么它是对的,为什么“significant in compounding”是awkward and wordy的??)

②“which already cost"v.s."already with business costs of"
(OG解释是说”already with business costs of“is awkward and wordy, 可是它难道没有修饰文法问题吗?——already with business costs of 离被修饰对象effects太远了???)

③ think further:如果我把正确选项B的 cost 改成“costs”,C选项后半部分改成“,which already with business costs of”,那请问现在答案选什么?
2019-10-14 13:45:56 来自 GMAT 专区
评论
1 楼
再加问第四个问题哈:
“significantly compounding”V.S.“significant in compounding” 这个考点是diction 还是 rhetorical construction?
2019-10-14 20:15
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 
Q1: significantly compounding  直接修饰的是 the use of crack and cocaine... 后者是前者的逻辑主语。如果用 significant in compounding 语义就变了。 significantly compounding 核心意思表达的是 compounding,而 significant in compounding 核心意思表达的是 significant。

Q2: 如果你说 already with business costs of 离被修饰对象effects太远,那换成定语从句就不远了吗~ 本质上还是表达有问题。

Q3: which already with business costs of 这就不是个句子,做不了定语从句 

2019-10-16 22:56
评论
我有话要说

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ