Caroline_7 郝海龙 老师提问:
03-05
#召唤陪练狮#
The difficulty for nineteenth-century advocates of the claim that forests helped regulate climate was that their argument (i)______ historical anecdote and observations. Proving the forest-climate link through verifiable and experimental scientific means rather than observation was (ii)______ for these individuals, a situation that eventually led to the link (iii)______ justifications for forest conservation.
Blank (i) Blank (ii) Blank (iii)
A. lacked D. problematic G. being revived in
B. discounted E. unnecessary H. dropping out of
C. employed F. straightforward I. losing out to
这道题第一空为什么选C呢,段落里的支持者不是认为observation比scientific means更好嘛。那第一空困难的话不是应该他们做不到observation嘛
2018-03-05 14:33:52 来自 陪练狮
评论
1 楼
如果第二空选 D 的话,显然这段话是认为 verifiable and experimental scientific means 比 historical anecdote and observations 更好,所以第一空说他们采用(employed)了 historical anecdote and observations 对他们维护自己的主张是有困难的,这个逻辑有什么问题吗?
2018-03-05 14:38
评论
2 楼

评论 1 楼: Proving the forest-climate link through verifiable and experimental scientific means rather than observation was (ii)______ for these individuals,
这部分的意思不是说不是通过observation,而是通过verifiable and experimental scientific means 得出的forest-climate link,对adovates 来说有问题嘛
2018-03-05 15:51
评论
3 楼
评论 2 楼: 你说的没错,所以这些人不会去使用 verifiable and experimental scientific means,所以这就是他们的问题所在啊。
2018-03-05 15:54
评论
4 楼
justifications 显然需要 verifiable and experimental scientific means,他们不能用 verifiable and experimental scientific means,所以他们不能 justifications,这就是他们的问题。
2018-03-05 15:56
评论
我有话要说

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ