Caroline_7 楼主
托福作文咩第 14 期 Day 2
#托福作文咩第 14 期 Day 2# Some people think that some lessons for young children (age 5-8) which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning, while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time. What is your opinion and why?
Our age witnesses that the video game has undergone a tremendous change from a sign of wealth and social status to a life necessity. Reportedly, most young children aged form five to eight spend a quite long time learning lessons which include video games. This phenomenon triggers a heated debate. Some people think that video games serve as effective and interesting ways of learning, while others think that these lesson are quite distracting. Form my perspective, these lessons can be seen as a waste of time. I will elaborate my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, it is impossible for young children to fully concentrate on the lessons for young children which include video games. This is because these lessons usually demands a relatively quite place and preoccupation from young children. Conversely, if young children learn lessons through video games, his or her attention is being torn apart and the efficiency of learning must be affected. A good case in point is that when I was young, if I wanna learn something, I have to devote all of my attention on it and cannot afford any sight disturbance. However, once I play video game, I only notice the animation in it and totally forget what I have to learn.
Besides, these lessons which include video games is likely to do harm to young children’s health. In an important stage in growth of young children, the organs and systems development are unfavorable to play video game for a long time which can pose an adverse effect on normal development, especially eyesight. More and more young people become shortsighted at a relatively young age which is a deeply regretful fact. This phenomenon ascribe to the extensive use of eyes by watching video games.
Admittedly, these lessons including video game can be b\very attractive to young children and can stimulate their interest in learning. However, we can not afford to lose young children’s physical development which is the priority compared to learning knowledge.
To put in the nutshell, young children are supposed to be preoccupied with their lessons without being disturbed by other distractions such as video games which can be a good way to release anxiety.
2016-09-06 11:03:11 来自 托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
With the fast development of technology, new kinds of entertainment like video games seems to become an important role in people's daily life. This phenomenon even triggers a debate in the field of education: should vedio games class be available to young children for their learning's sake? Of course some peoople are against this advice because it is a waste of time. So am I. I am going to elaborate my viewpoint in the following. Vedio games firstly lower the efficiency of young children's study. It is widely admitted that video games are such dangerous things for people who cannot control themselves. As for children, whose self-control ability is not developed, they can hardly focus on other things again once they are accessble to video games. And their learning efficiency will fall unavoidably. My primary classmate Wang is an example. Before Wang started playing video games, he did well in all the courses. Unfortunately, Wang took a video game lesson and was keen to it after that. He seldom went back to homework again, but wasting his time day and night in game rooms. He was forced to stay in the same grade for his bad action in the final examination. What video games bring children more is the harmness in communicating with others. Age five to eight is a foremost period that young children can easily establish friendship with their mates. Anything makes them hanging on one point does harm to the process, so does video games. And video game lesson can play the role. A recently research shows that those children who are crazy about video games are more likely to be self-closing, which will draw great damage to their future development. And most of their temper is getting worse, easy to be angry. You can never imagine a furious child is welcome to his classmates. Well, we have to confess that no video games may make the childhood dull. But as we are sure of children's first task is learning, why not endure a little dull life? Childhood is so precious that it is not capable of shouldering the risk of being self-closing or weary of studying. In conclusion, I think video games lessons are distracting and wasteful. It destroy children's interests for study, furthermore, their motivation of making friends will also decrease. No video games childhood seems not attractive, but it is right.
It seems that children education plays a central role in their childhood. Being educated at an early age has a possibility of paving the road to their future life. However, there is a welcomed statement that some lessons including video games for young children, mainly at the age of 5 to 8, can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning. As far as I am concerned, I stand by the opposite point because of the following reasons as what I want to represent. Firstly, Taking video games lesson is more likely to deteriorate children’s eyesight. Children at an early age with a bad eyesight have a lot of troubles in their life. It means they have to wear glasses, maybe they will have some diffident moods because of looking so different with others. Taking my brother for example, he is 6 years old, with poor eyesight because of watching too much video games from television. He feels so terrible after wearing glasses. So from the aspect of one’s eyesight, children shouldn’t be allowed to have video games classes to some extent. Secondly, video games lesson allures children to waste a lot of time to accomplish. Children are too young to use an appropriate ways to deal with video games. Reversely, they may spend too much time on video games, which produces a bad impact on their studies. It is a common phenomenon in some families, if parents don’t give children what they want, especially phones, they will refuse to have a meal. It is a great problem for parents to confront to. Therefore, taking video games classes sounds like unsuitable. Granted, video games is an useful way for children to focus on, as a result of this interesting method, which will emerge some advantageous results. Children of course will be more controllable than usual, they are more eager to take classes and join in some games. However, consider some disadvantages, it is better for school not to introduce video games lessons. In conclusion, I strongly believe that taking video games classes is not a good idea, bad eyesight and too much addicted to video games are such important consequences for teachers to pay attention to, which will have a bad influence on their future development.
With the popularity of the online products, progressively amount of propagandas combined the features of the vital characters in the video games. A few of the elements even penetrated into the children’s routine courses. In terms of the learning method of the children, someone did appreciate the chance to study at a cheerful status while others regard it as a waste of time. From my point of view, I stand behind the appealing way with the insertion of video games for children’s study. Primarily, as the waves of video games infiltrate in our life, we should get a better usage of its prevalence and spur the children’s motivation to study. Generally speaking, with the active cartoon characters and the vivid video games, the students are more likely to concentrate on the content and use their brains to think it over. Especially for some competitive games, they would exert themselves to work it out and try their best to win or to get the reward. In another word, it is a smart way to stimulate the children’s study zeal. In the next place, it is of an early age for them to accept the stodge and systematical learning style. They need a colorful childhood with the company of the lovely items. When it comes to the games they would have an eye on and be patient enough to follow the rules. It is the most familiar way for them to engage in since their childhood stands on the basis of simple games. For instance, my little sister is 6 right now, she shows a great interest in the online video games. One of their courses is related to the angry bird, and she told me the whole class were excited to take apart in the study and raised their hands to answer the questioned the teacher proposed. Frankly speaking, it is of vital importance to trigger the children’s interest in study. To start the courses related to the video games is a smart way to push them forward and learn more by themselves.
learning is a life-long endeavor that deserves multilateral support. but for young children, naughty is their nature. thus, there are some lessons for young children which include video games, this phenomenon triggers a heated debate, some people think it can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning, while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time. the way i see it, the lessons which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning. my viewpoint is based on the following reasons. first, the lessons which include video games stimulates their enthusiasm of their study, interest is the best teacher, the vivid pictures on the screens makes the study time more enjoyable, watching video games is the most direct way for children to learn about the knowledge, besides, video games is also an effective teaching tool that helps enhance learning efficiency, the superior visual and sound effects help leave a profound impression in the viewers and improve their learning effectiveness. my bother is a perfect example, he didn't like learning, without any other means, his mother sent him to attend a lesson which include video games, he is interested in learning and gets improved, now. in addition, the lessons which include video games can broaden their knowledge. the contents in videos have wider knowledge than that in books, videos provide the students with not only what they have learned in the book, but also some information concerning the latest happenings at home and abroad, sitting before a screen, children are blessed with a bright window, from which the brilliant cultures of all nations can be seen. for example, my classmate, lily knows a lot of history knowledge, which she learned from close to history, video games of this lesson shown the social and historical background of each chapter, therefore, the knowledge leaves a deeply impression on him. last but not least, lessons with video games are quite distracting, however, as a auxiliary means, it's advantage knocks everything else into a cocked hat, if children can combine with books or lessons and video games, they will be greatly improved, in a word, the lessons and video games sometimes construct no conflicts between each other. to put in a nutshell, some lessons for young children which include video games can serve as a effective and interesting ways of learning, it is not a waste of time, it can widen the vision, the children are more preoccupied with learning, with the reasonable attitude to take advantage of video games, you will make a difference.
Some people think that some lessons for young children (age 5-8) which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning, while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time. What is your opinion and why? 题目翻译 某些人认为,一些为5-8岁小孩设置的包过电子游戏在内的课程,可以为他们的学习提供有效的有趣的方法,而其他人认为这些课会令小孩分心,浪费时间。 你的意见是什么 为什么? 中文提纲 背景:电子游戏好,是每个人的童年回忆 引出:有这么个问题 当提到改不改为小孩设置关于玩游戏的课程时,人们意见不同,许多人认为对学习好 自己意见: 但是我认为这很片面 有失偏颇 过渡: 我的理由如下 第二段 论点: 小孩没有自制力不能控制打游戏的时间。 刚玩游戏比较好奇,容易上瘾,即使不上打游戏的课。上了就完了就更爱玩了管不住了,没时间学习了。 举例子 我邻居小孩。。。。 小孩得培养良好的习惯,这些时间不能用来学打游戏 应该多看看书 第三段 论点: 游戏的情节固定 模式单一 学不到什么东西 而且虚拟世界与现实脱节 不利于他们的学习 可以学习更多现实生活中的东西 如生物 绘画之类的。。 让步 当然了打游戏也有好处 可以减少学习压力 开发智力 但是由于小孩控制不住自己 而且游戏没什么好内容甚至低俗 所以我不建议开 以上是我的观点 为了孩子们的健康成长 别太轻率开这种课! It cannot be too good to play video games when we are not being occupied; almost every adult likes to play them and some of whom even adept to them! How about the children? Should they learn how to play video games? This issue is heatedly debated currently. Quite a few people argue that some lessons including video games are recommended to be added in teaching syllabus of children for their effective study and interest. At the first glance, I am stunned and argue that this assertion is rather absurd and ridiculous, have you ever attended the class concerning video games? My reasons are as follows. First, it is undoubted that most children at the age of 5-8 do not have mature self-control ability. A child is usually very curious and eager for everything new. Even if they are not taught in a video game lesson, they will try to learn how to play it, not mention if they are taught. However, without perfect self-control, they are susceptible to be addicted to video games after class. For instance, a five-year old son of my friend Bob, took part in a computer class, the little boy always played games after attending the class, which made him a strange boy. Obviously, the valuable time for playing toys and learning practical skills will be encroached by video games. With that, a child will learn nothing but only playing video games! Second, most video games have single plot and do not deserve to learn. The most conspicuous shortcoming of a video game is its limited content that sometime vulgar and violent, which is not only helpless but also harmful to children. Such as some shooting games, just pressing few buttons, you can kill animals even people on the screen, which is too simple to teach. However, children are liable to imitate what they see in the video game, and become aggressive to others. Admittedly, lesson on video games provide a new way for children to enjoy themselves as well as learn something interesting effectively, but the latent threat is more worth worrying than the superficial advantage. For the children’s good study, such class is suggested not to be set up.


安装 QQ