Lucky-Ice 楼主
05-14
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9# 我作文太烂了..先不写了..我去看看大神们的
2016-05-14 10:54:14 来自 托福作文咩
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
In this rapid improving time,with the development of society people concentrate more on education and put more and more money in it.How to edute has already become a popular topic.All of this time,there is no lack of the discussion of education in society.For example, which is better to children's education,study in classroom or study in field class.In my opinion,field classes is beter.The main reasons are listed as follows In the first place, field lesson is of great help to the better understanding of the knowledge we study. When we study in the classroom, we can only learn by books and multimedia courseware. We often have to understand the content stiffly. But if we can have a field lesson, students are able to get rid of the limit of the classroom. We are capable of observing the things we study at short range. We may even can do it ourselves to expand understanding. Comprehending things not only be confined to class but also from shape, size, color, smell, tactility and so on. For instance, when we have a mechanics class, the teacher need to introduce some machines and some corresponding operation method.If we can have a field lesson,we can go to the factory.Teacher can explain and at the same time he can demonstrate for students.May be we can operate the machines and experience the differences and similarity between them.Nonetheless,we can only stay in classroom,and understand the experience that provided from others through books and coursewares without comprehend by self.So,it is better to study by field lesson than study in classroom. In addition,field lesson does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about study.As the saying goes,interest is the best teacher.Field lesson can further motivate the interests of students and the desire of expploring.Just like me,when I participated in the metalworking practice,we went to the factory,and we study many kinds of basic skill in industrial machinery.Everyone got a saw,a hammer, a vernier caliper and so on.Then we used some mechine to proceed a series of working,such as welding,casting, fitter and so forth.It was a very interesting process.At last,we made a plane model and a hammer as a mark.In the production,I experienced some warning that our teacher had already told us.But I did not understanded it until I made mistakes.This example shows that the spoon-feeding teaching is boring and inefficiency,only will we feel imprssed when we undergo and try to work out.In the meantime,we have a desire to explore more actively.As a consequence,compare with study in classroom,field lesson is better to the education of students. Some people think study in classroom is better than field study。This is because in the classroom,teachers can regular students conviently.And teachers can also concentrate students' attention.But during the field study,teachers can not give consideration to every students.As far as I am concerned,students who do not listen carefully because of the boring content.If we can study outdoor,students can do something themselves.Everyone will attend.It is undeniable that filed study is so much the better than study indoor. All in all, there is supported by sound reasons that field lesson is helpful for students' understanding of knowladge.It can also stimulate their study interests and drive their enthusiasm.These are all benefit in the spread of education.So I think it is better to students.
An old Chinese saying goes, 'It takes ten years to grow trees but a hundred years to rear people '.With the remarkable progress of the society, enormous changes have occurred in the field of education. There has historically been plentiful of debate about education. For example, which has better influence on children, in terms of field trips or classroom teaching. Personally speaking, it is more reasonable to choose to learn things in the real situation. My reasons and examples are given bellow. First of all, field trips contributes to students' good understanding of knowledge. Teaching in the classroom imparts the knowledge through the simple method, including the book and video. But if they can learn it in the real scene, students can overcome the limitation of the classroom to observe the objects themselves. It can deepen the understanding of the knowledge of smell, touching, sound or appearance more than reading from books. For example, if they can have history class in the museum or memorial, children will learn more aspects of that period of history from the showed historical relics and pictures. Museums with various ages and themes cannot only give the information in different points of view, but also increasing the interest of students who have less attention to the history class. That is to say field trip teaching has more advantages than the classroom teaching. Secondary, field trip teaching is better at stimulating students' delight in knowledge. There goes that interest is the best teacher. If field trips can do better in stirring up kids' inquisitiveness, it is admitted that it's a better scholastic method. As my recollection, we went to Anti Japanese Memorial Hall in a history class. We really felt we were in that battle by looking at the gun the soldiers used and the articles for their daily use. Plus, we experienced the 3D-simulated war game which touches us greatly about the ruthless of war to educate us to cherish the peace. This class arouse my curiosity of history to a large extend. The interest to study is well raised up by field trips are proved in such example. Therefore, it is more crucial for students to learn from field trips rather than the classroom. Some people believe that classroom education does better than field trips. Since they may too excited about the objects observed or activities attended, students are most likely to forget the core aim of gaining knowledge. However, it is of such interest in attracting them that can help them to remember the process of leading them to review the information themselves after class. Field trips teaching, which benefits more to kids, has more incomparable merits. In short, field trips teaching helps students to gain a better understanding of knowledge. Plus, it is better at stimulating students' delight in information of books to drive learning initiative. All of above benefit the achievement of aim of imparting knowledge, which is confirmed good for kids' development.
Field trips are a form of education that enables the students to learn and experience outdoors. Schools and individuals hold distinctive opinions on the importance of field trips to education quality. Some contend that staying in a classroom is the fundamental way of children getting involved and thus the best. However, I regard this assertion as arbitrary and believe that field trips are better for children’s schooling. My reasons and examples are given as follows. In addition, going on field trips does better in stirring up children's inquisitiveness about study. It stated that the interest is a best teacher. Going on field trips is preferable to children's education if it is able to motivate children's curiosity of study. When I was in high school, one day my biology teacher led us to go out of the classroom and into the campus in order to seek for those plants which appeared on the biology textbook. We found a dozen kinds of plants in those places which we ignored previously. The teacher gave us a detailed illustration on what we had found. I bore all he said in mind and was excited about this subject. The past is still close to me since so many years went by. It confirms that students probably regard field trips as adventures, which might stimulate their delight in study. Going on field trips contributes more on children's education compared to learning in the classroom. However, some arise out of the opinion that staying in the classroom at school is more preferable to field trips, asserting that emergencies like safety accidents and straying may occur in field trips. In fact, no evidence indicates that staying in the classroom is absolutely safe. The comparative safety of children completely depends on supervision and the regular inspection of potential risks and security threats. If these two cannot be run, emergencies can happen even indoors. Thus, with the benefits mentioned above taken into consideration, field trips are more advantageous and constructive for children's education rather than staying in the classroom. In summary, field trips contribute to a more thorough acquirement of knowledge and motivate the children to find out more about that particular subject, having long-term benefits to kids. Therefore, field trips are preferable to learn in a classroom and should be encouraged.
Homework 1 百年大计,教育为本。随着社会的发展,人们对教育的关注越来越多,投入的时间和金钱比重也越来越大,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直也来,社会上都不乏涉及教育的讨论。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学的知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助于书本,显得枯燥乏味,效果也不好。但如果可以将我们的课堂放到教室之外,学生可以摆脱教室和书本的限制,通过外观、声音、味道等感官近距离接触所学的东西,这非常有助于学生对知识的理解。例如语文课上《醉翁亭记》,如果老师仅仅是对学生讲解书本上所写的文字内容的话,学生并不一定能够很好的理解欧阳修文字中描写的景色,只能空凭想象。但如果这节课可以实地到醉翁亭去上,那就完全不一样了,老师可以对照课文将周围的景物一一讲解,非常有利于学生对课文中的景色以及作者思想的理解。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。初中的时候我们的化学课上,老师带我们去实验室上课,我们得以真正实践那些在我们课本上出现的实验,并观察它们的现象,就像一次探险。这样的实践对于我的帮助非常大,我深深地爱上了化学这门课。从初中到高中,化学都是我学的最好的学科。相比之下,对那些只在教室里纸上谈兵的课程我就不是那么喜欢,学的也不是那么好。这个例子说明,我们去实验室上化学课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有些人可能认为在教室学习必实地学习对孩子的教育更好,他们觉得实地学习可能会造成学生完全抛弃书本理论知识的学习。事实上,只要老师能够良好的结合书本与实践,这是完全可以避免的。而实地学习具有教室学习无可比拟的优点,所以这对孩子的教育更有利。 简言之,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都更益于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 Homework 2 As is known to all, education is the bed rock of a country’s long term development. With the development of society, people begin to pay more and more attention on education. An increasing investment of time and fund has also been spent on education. This encourages reforms and innovations on the ways of education. There has always been plentiful discussion about education. For instance, which is a better way to educate our children, to study in the classroom or to go on a field study? From my own opinion, field study does more benefits on students’ education. Here are my reasons. To begin with, field study is conductive to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Studying in the classroom, students can only learn with the aid of text book. It seems dull and boring, as well as bad effect. But if we put our lesson to the outside, students can get rid of the classroom’s constraint. They may touch the things they’ve learned through their senses, such as appearances, sounds and tastes. It contributes their understanding a lot. For instance, a Chinese class which is teaching “Account of Inebriate Pavilion”, if teachers only read the text book to the students, students may not get a good comprehension on the beautiful scene and Ouyang Xiu’s thoughts indicated in the article. They may only depend on their poor imagination. However, if the class is taught in Inebriate Pavilion, there would be a totally difference. Teachers can make every scenery written in the article to match the mountains, rivers around. It benefits the students’ understanding a lot. This way is more vivid than classroom based only on textbook and impress students more. Consequently, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Next, field study is more likely to arouse one’s curiosity of studying. As the old saying, interest is the best teacher. If the field study performance better on exciting the students’ interests, this method benefits children more than studying in the classroom. During my junior time, my chemistry teacher always put classes in the lab so that we could practice those experiments on our textbook and observe the phenomena of them. Experiment made everything in the chemistry class like an exploration. This practice helped me a lot. I got fascinated with chemistry. From my junior to senior high, chemistry was my best subject. I always got a full score. Relatively, I was not interest with those class without field study. I performance fair on those ones. This example illustrates that field study can truly improve students’ interests in study. I believe that many of the students have the same experience with me. Therefore, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study does more benefits on children’s education. Some people may believe that studying in the classroom has more benefits on students’ education than field study. They hold the opinion that field study has possibility to cause children to override theoretical learning. As a matter of fact, if the teacher can combine textbook learning and practice well, this circumstance can be avoided. Field study has advantages which studying in the classroom can’t compare with so that field study does more help on students’ learning than studying in the classroom. Briefly, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. It also innovates their interest on study better and pull up their activity on study. These are more beneficial to realize the purpose of knowledge’s spreading through education. Consequently, it contributes a lot to children’s education.

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ