16期CC 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9# Homework 1
百年大计,教育为本。随着社会的发展,人们对教育的关注越来越多,投入的时间和金钱比重也越来越大,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直也来,社会上都不乏涉及教育的讨论。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。
首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学的知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助于书本,显得枯燥乏味,效果也不好。但如果可以将我们的课堂放到教室之外,学生可以摆脱教室和书本的限制,通过外观、声音、味道等感官近距离接触所学的东西,这非常有助于学生对知识的理解。例如语文课上《醉翁亭记》,如果老师仅仅是对学生讲解书本上所写的文字内容的话,学生并不一定能够很好的理解欧阳修文字中描写的景色,只能空凭想象。但如果这节课可以实地到醉翁亭去上,那就完全不一样了,老师可以对照课文将周围的景物一一讲解,非常有利于学生对课文中的景色以及作者思想的理解。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。
其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。初中的时候我们的化学课上,老师带我们去实验室上课,我们得以真正实践那些在我们课本上出现的实验,并观察它们的现象,就像一次探险。这样的实践对于我的帮助非常大,我深深地爱上了化学这门课。从初中到高中,化学都是我学的最好的学科。相比之下,对那些只在教室里纸上谈兵的课程我就不是那么喜欢,学的也不是那么好。这个例子说明,我们去实验室上化学课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。
有些人可能认为在教室学习必实地学习对孩子的教育更好,他们觉得实地学习可能会造成学生完全抛弃书本理论知识的学习。事实上,只要老师能够良好的结合书本与实践,这是完全可以避免的。而实地学习具有教室学习无可比拟的优点,所以这对孩子的教育更有利。
简言之,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都更益于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。

Homework 2
As is known to all, education is the bed rock of a country’s long term development. With the development of society, people begin to pay more and more attention on education. An increasing investment of time and fund has also been spent on education. This encourages reforms and innovations on the ways of education. There has always been plentiful discussion about education.
For instance, which is a better way to educate our children, to study in the classroom or to go on a field study? From my own opinion, field study does more benefits on students’ education. Here are my reasons.
To begin with, field study is conductive to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Studying in the classroom, students can only learn with the aid of text book. It seems dull and boring, as well as bad effect. But if we put our lesson to the outside, students can get rid of the classroom’s constraint. They may touch the things they’ve learned through their senses, such as appearances, sounds and tastes. It contributes their understanding a lot. For instance, a Chinese class which is teaching “Account of Inebriate Pavilion”, if teachers only read the text book to the students, students may not get a good comprehension on the beautiful scene and Ouyang Xiu’s thoughts indicated in the article. They may only depend on their poor imagination. However, if the class is taught in Inebriate Pavilion, there would be a totally difference. Teachers can make every scenery written in the article to match the mountains, rivers around. It benefits the students’ understanding a lot. This way is more vivid than classroom based only on textbook and impress students more. Consequently, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned.
Next, field study is more likely to arouse one’s curiosity of studying. As the old saying, interest is the best teacher. If the field study performance better on exciting the students’ interests, this method benefits children more than studying in the classroom. During my junior time, my chemistry teacher always put classes in the lab so that we could practice those experiments on our textbook and observe the phenomena of them. Experiment made everything in the chemistry class like an exploration. This practice helped me a lot. I got fascinated with chemistry. From my junior to senior high, chemistry was my best subject. I always got a full score. Relatively, I was not interest with those class without field study. I performance fair on those ones. This example illustrates that field study can truly improve students’ interests in study. I believe that many of the students have the same experience with me. Therefore, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study does more benefits on children’s education.
Some people may believe that studying in the classroom has more benefits on students’ education than field study. They hold the opinion that field study has possibility to cause children to override theoretical learning. As a matter of fact, if the teacher can combine textbook learning and practice well, this circumstance can be avoided. Field study has advantages which studying in the classroom can’t compare with so that field study does more help on students’ learning than studying in the classroom.
Briefly, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. It also innovates their interest on study better and pull up their activity on study. These are more beneficial to realize the purpose of knowledge’s spreading through education. Consequently, it contributes a lot to children’s education.
2016-05-13 19:18:06 来自 托福作文咩
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
Centenary progress bases on education. With the development of society, people pay more attention to education and spend more time and money on it, which make eduction creative and evolutionary constantly. As always, discussion relating to education is abundant. For instance, which way, going on field trips is better for children’s education and staying in the classroom at school, is better one on education. As the point of my view, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. There are two reasons as given below. In the first place, going on field trips is conducive to students to better understand their knowledge. Students can only study with books and references on course, conversely, people can break the limit of classes by going on field trips, and get close and more clearly observe what they learn through several aspects, including appearance, sound, smell and feel, instead of staying in books. For instance, in an art class, the teacher organizes her students to go outdoors to draw from nature. At that time, students can personally experience the scene and observe things around there. As a result, these experiences enable students to draw their works well, meantime, and develop their appropriations of the kind thesis of masterpieces. In addition, field-trip study does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about learning subjects. There is a common saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If it can arouse students' enthusiasm by studying on field trips, the way will do better on education of students. I do remember that at a rainy afternoon, we followed the teacher and got out of a biology course to observe changes of organism. I was so surprised about what I found and realized how amazing the biological world was. After then, biology lesson always could attract my attention to study deeply and constantly. Now, although the time just went by, the scene seemed like happened yesterday. Compared with dull books, fields study can bring more fun, and arouse students' inquisitiveness about knowledge. There is another point that some people believe that staying in the classroom at school is better for students than going on field trips. After all, there exist some danger outside. As a matter of fact, we hasn't got the evidence of students' perfect safety in classroom, which mostly depends on teachers' arrangements and managements, and the problem of attention is guided by the way of imparting. If a teacher has some bugs on his managements, students’ safety can not be guaranteed, even though they are in classroom. Conversely, field study shows incomparable advantages better for students' education. In brief, field study is conducive to better understanding what students learn, and arousing their interest of study, spurring students‘ enthusiasm. All of these benefit the educational goal of imparting knowledge. Therefore, it shows more helpful about education.
作业一:略 作业二:The education is the fundamental project in the project of vital and lasting importance. As the development of society, increasing people focus on the education, which brings a scale of money and time investment on it and the way of education has constant changes of innovation. As always, discussion relating to education is abundant. For example, in contrast, studying in the classroom and going on a field-trip, which is the better way for students' education. In my opinion, going on a field-trip has more merits than studying in the classroom. My reasons and evdiences are given below. In the first place,going on field trips is of great help to understanding the knowledge what we have learned. Students can not only rely on books and PPT to study, but students can get away from the confinement of classroom in the process of field trip studying by close observation of all aspects of what we have learnd such as shape,sound, smell and touch instead of only holding in books, which make us understand deeply. For example, at a biology class, teachers will impart all kinds of plants to students. If the class is at a botany yard or in a field trip, students can get an opportunity to touch all kinds of plants directly. In this way, they can not only observe the true appearances of all kinds of plants having in nature, but also can smell the different odors they may give forth and compare with the different environments in which they are. This field trips studying is more vivid than studying in a classroom through books or PPT. The former makes deeper impression and easiler understanding on students than the other. So compared with classroom studying, I believe that the field trips studying is better for students. In additin, going on field trips does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about studying. As an old saying goes, interesting is the best teacher for us. If studying on field-trip is better at stimulating students' curiosity of studying, it is more conductive to students studying on field-trip than studying on classroom. For instance, I remember that in the natural class at my elementary school, after a heavey rain, my teacher take us for a field-trip studying to felt the fresh air and fantastic scenery. At that moment, everything in the nature is so interesting to us. It seems to everywhere in the nature worthy to explore for us, which just like a adventure for us. From that day, the natural class became my most favorite class that I always have a great expection on it. Though many years had gone, I still have remembered the natural class in that day. By contrast, those natural class at classroom which I have forgotten all of them. A good case in point, if we going on field trips at a natural class, students fell that it is very interesting just like a adventure expedition. These stimulate students' interest on studying. I think many people have this kind of experience that we excite when we hear about the natural class on a field. So I believe that going on field trips is better for students' studying, compare with the classroom-studying. Admittedly, some people claim that studying in the classroom is better at education than going on field trips.For going on field trips may probably bring some secure accident, while studying in the classroom is relatively safe. Actually, there is no evidence pointing to study in the classroom that is absolutely safe. Whether safe or not is depended on teachers' management of organization. If teachers manage confusedly, studying in the classroom is also not absolutely safe for students. In contrast, going on field trips has the merits which studying in the classroom can not match. So I believe that going on field trips is more conducitve for students on education. To put it in a nutshell, going on field trips is more conductive for students' understanding of knowledge which they learn in books, compare with studying in the classroom. It also stimulates their interests of learning and promotes their positivity of studying, which contributes to the purpose of education imparting the knowledge. So I hold the view that going on field trips is a better way for students' education.
In this rapid improving time,with the development of society people concentrate more on education and put more and more money in it.How to edute has already become a popular topic.All of this time,there is no lack of the discussion of education in society.For example, which is better to children's education,study in classroom or study in field class.In my opinion,field classes is beter.The main reasons are listed as follows In the first place, field lesson is of great help to the better understanding of the knowledge we study. When we study in the classroom, we can only learn by books and multimedia courseware. We often have to understand the content stiffly. But if we can have a field lesson, students are able to get rid of the limit of the classroom. We are capable of observing the things we study at short range. We may even can do it ourselves to expand understanding. Comprehending things not only be confined to class but also from shape, size, color, smell, tactility and so on. For instance, when we have a mechanics class, the teacher need to introduce some machines and some corresponding operation method.If we can have a field lesson,we can go to the factory.Teacher can explain and at the same time he can demonstrate for students.May be we can operate the machines and experience the differences and similarity between them.Nonetheless,we can only stay in classroom,and understand the experience that provided from others through books and coursewares without comprehend by self.So,it is better to study by field lesson than study in classroom. In addition,field lesson does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about study.As the saying goes,interest is the best teacher.Field lesson can further motivate the interests of students and the desire of expploring.Just like me,when I participated in the metalworking practice,we went to the factory,and we study many kinds of basic skill in industrial machinery.Everyone got a saw,a hammer, a vernier caliper and so on.Then we used some mechine to proceed a series of working,such as welding,casting, fitter and so forth.It was a very interesting process.At last,we made a plane model and a hammer as a mark.In the production,I experienced some warning that our teacher had already told us.But I did not understanded it until I made mistakes.This example shows that the spoon-feeding teaching is boring and inefficiency,only will we feel imprssed when we undergo and try to work out.In the meantime,we have a desire to explore more actively.As a consequence,compare with study in classroom,field lesson is better to the education of students. Some people think study in classroom is better than field study。This is because in the classroom,teachers can regular students conviently.And teachers can also concentrate students' attention.But during the field study,teachers can not give consideration to every students.As far as I am concerned,students who do not listen carefully because of the boring content.If we can study outdoor,students can do something themselves.Everyone will attend.It is undeniable that filed study is so much the better than study indoor. All in all, there is supported by sound reasons that field lesson is helpful for students' understanding of knowladge.It can also stimulate their study interests and drive their enthusiasm.These are all benefit in the spread of education.So I think it is better to students.
The process of modernization gives birth to educational methods diversified such as traditional class, field lesson, online course, and so forth. Accordingly, when it comes to education, there has always been plentiful of discussions about it. For example, which is more beneficial for students between classroom learning and field-based studying? Personally speaking, learning outside is do better because students can gain knowledge more vividly and initiatively. Following reasons elaborated upon my upper point. To begin with, field lesson is of great help to students to understand what they have learned on books. In terms of students, studying from teaching material, not only are they bald and abstract, but also not easily be acceptable. While combining the theory with practice, it is conducive to students to understand and utilize through observation, sound, taste and touch. To some extents, the significance of studying in the real scene cannot be exaggerated. For example, a physics course, a teacher inform students of light component and refraction. If this class was a field lesson, students can water in air and then observe the different color of a rainbow outside. Under this situation, students can understand the conception and principle theory of light. By contrast, in the class, through books, the light formation cannot be imaged easily and vigorously. Consequently, field lesson contributes to students in-deep studying and understanding. Secondary, field lesson is do better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness. Commonly, the regular means of teaching in class bored students, and by contrast, field lesson shows an amusing way in front of them. Generally speaking, interest is the best teacher. Once forming a habit due to interest and hobby, students can learn spontaneously. There is an example to my mind. I still remember one biology course when the teacher took us to marine park. We had seen the animals, such as polar bears, penguins, sharks, jellyfishes, which were introduced in books. The feeling of close encounter quite differed from that of learning. All the things--the cute shapes, fascinating characteristics and peculiar sound of those animals—incredibly attracted us. After that trip, our class built up study groups to learn the marine world actively. What fantastic the field lesson is. Some people consider that it is more efficiency of studying in classroom than of field lesson, because field-based learning is likely to distract students, especially for them who are lower self-control. Besides, taking part in outside class, they would hardly gain the relevant knowledge, and also spend time on what they should spend on school in the same time. Virtually, there is no evidence showing that daily learning in school is more effective than outside. However, students’ could not focus on the knowledge in practice, they cannot concentrate in class as well. At least, outside learning gives students more direct perception about what they learned. In a nutshell, field lesson impart knowledge to students profoundly and vividly. Simultaneously, this method stimulates students’ delight in studying and cultivate their enthusiasm. Therefore, field lesson is important for students to acquire knowledge.
【作业一】 请根据周一到周四的训练,修改之前的内容,写一篇完整的中文作文。作文可以包括一个背景段、两个理由段、一个让步段和一个总结段,也可以包括一个背景段、三个理由段和一个总结段。理由可以和之前用的理由相同,也可以不同。 随着经济的迅猛发展,教育的重要性也在日益凸显。多数先进和发展中国家都渴望能够培育出一个诺贝尔得奖人为国争光。如果人们不能受到良好的教育,就不能跟上社会发展的脚步,很容易被激烈的竞争淘汰。这就需要不断反思我们的教育方法和教育理念。是实地学习还是在教室学习对孩子们的教育更好呢?我认为,显然,实地学习是一个更为卓越的教育方式。 首先,实地学习能够帮助学生更好地理解所学课程。很多学科的知识都是来源于日常生活当中。如果仅仅从课本和视频中了解这些内容,不仅抽象而且晦涩难懂。而实地学习给了学生亲自感受这些知识的机会,从而使得抽象的知识变得具体。例如,很多学校开设有天文学课程,但他们中的大部分都只是给学生展示一些关于宇宙的图片或者视频。如果学校能够将课程安排到晚上,通过天文望远镜让他们实际观测他们头顶的星空有多么浩瀚而迷人,就可以帮助他们更好地理解课本上的知识。这种实地学习使得所学的知识变得非常形象,因而更容易为学生所理解,也就提高了学习的效率。因此,与在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 另外,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。如果仅仅在教室里学习课本知识,学生很容易感到乏味,导致对这门课程的兴趣降低。而实地学习比课堂学习更有趣也更生动,对于学生的吸引力也更强。在中学时期,我们曾经选修过一门叫做植物鉴赏的课程。每次上课的时候,老师就会组织我们来到学校的花园,对一些比较有代表性的植物进行辨认和讲解,并鼓励我们把它们都画下来,做成一本画册。现在,我仍然保留着这本画册,每次我翻开它,仿佛都能闻到微微潮湿的空气混杂着泥土的清香,还有各种各样的花草独特的味道。这让我始终保持着对植物的好奇心和对大自然的热爱。显然,正是一次又一次的实地学习帮助我更好地了解了各类植物的特征和魅力,并且激发了我对这门课程的兴趣。因此,和在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 有人认为在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。因为在教室学习学生的注意力可以更集中,对于知识的理解也会更加有效。但是注意力集中只是导致好的学习效果的一个方面,如果没有实地学习增强孩子们对于抽象概念的理解,注意力再集中也对学习知识起不到任何作用。因此,实地学习在教育孩子的过程中更重要。 总之,实地学习不仅可以帮助学生更好地理解所学知识,还能激发学生的学习兴趣,突显了知识的性质和相应教育方法的先进性。因此,我更赞同孩子应当多进行实地学习。 【作业二】 请将你写的中文作文翻译成英文。 Along with the dash for economic growth has come the increasing magnitude of education. To have a native - born Nobel laureate is what most developing and developed countries crave for as an unparalleled honor. If people acquire undesirable education, they cannot abreast with the steps of social development and easy to be eliminated in the fierce competition, which impels us continuously to rethink our educational approaches and philosophy. Is going on field trips better for children’s education or staying in the classroom at school? I perceive, obviously, that attending field trips is a more excellent method of education. To begin with, going on field trips is conductive to students’ better understanding of the knowledge they learned. It’s generally considered that quite a little knowledge is derived from our routine life. And that is not only abstract but impenetrable if we just study them in our textbooks or videos. While going on field trips offers us a precious opportunity to contact the knowledge by ourselves, which turns abstraction into concretization. For instance, plenty of universities open courses of astronomy. Most of them, however, are merely offer a few pictures or videos of universe. If schools arrange astronomy course at night, and afford the students some astronomical telescopes to have them observe the starry skies above them, not only can it help students understand the textbooks’ content more effortlessly, but also arouse their interests about the course. This learning method will make knowledge we known vivid, so the students can comprehend it easily, which improves the efficiency of their studying. Consequently, going on field trips is better than staying in the classroom at school during the learning period. Secondary, going on field is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. It is universally known that learning textbook knowledge in the classroom merely may contribute to students’ boredom, which results in their reducing interests to the course. While attending field trips has stronger attraction to students for it’s more fascinating and vivid. During my high school, I ever take a certain course called Plant Appreciation. Every time I attended class, the teacher would invite students to go to school’s garden and illustrate a few plants for us. In addition, she proposed some suggestion that we could draw the flora and write some explanations about them, make a picture book finally. I still remain the book now. When I flip it, it seems that there is some moist smell from an April shower or the unfolding of a bud. The universe is its temple. It unfolds into the numberless flowers of spring. It waves in the branches of trees and the green blades of grass, which attract me for all time. Obviously, it is the constant field trips that assist me know the characteristics and charming of varieties of plants, and arouse my interests about the course. Thereby, it can achieve better that attending practical study than learning in classroom. Some people hold the view that studying in classrooms is better than going on field trips for children’s education, since they perceive students would be more concentrated and have a more effective learning in doors. Concentration, however, is just a certain respect which contributes to a favorable study results. Thereby, being concentrated is not functional in studying knowledge without attending field trips reinforcing students’ comprehension of abstraction. Consequently, going on field trips is more paramount for children’s education. In brief, not only can going on field trips assist students to understand knowledge better, but also arouse their interests of learning, highlights progressiveness in the nature of knowledge and corresponding methods of education. Consequently, I am favorable to studying field trips.

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ