kkiki 楼主
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9# With the social developing, people pay more attention on the education. As always, discussion relating to education is abundant. What is the best way for education between going to the felid trips and studying in the classroom? In my opinion, going to the felid trips is the best way for education. There are the following two aspects.
To begin with, going on the filed trips is conductive to students better understand of knowledge. When students study at the classroom, they only can use textbooks and courseware. On the contrary, during the process of going on filed trips, students break away from the limitation of the classroom,observe the things closely and learn vividly through the different aspects in terms of the appearance, sound, taste and feel. We do not only stand on the book so that we are able to learn it deeper. A history class serves as a good example. The teacher would like to introduce some events and characters. If students visit the historical museum, they are able to touch the imitational ancient artifacts and skim through the relative books and records that bring the different feeling to the visitors. Students would don’t think about the knowledge and just take over what the teacher taught.
Next, going on field trips is more likely to arouse students’ curiosity of study. It is often said that the interest is the best teacher. Field study would stimulate students to be interested on study. I can still remember the composition class. We went to the nearby park and saw the blooming flowers. We just have personal experience, then, we are able to write down vivid composition. I believe that many people have the similar experience. They are so excited going on the field trips. As a result, going on field trips is better than staying in the classroom.
Someone considers that studying in the classroom has more advantages than going on the field trips. Because teachers would impart more knowledge, it could be more effective. In fact, students determined the efficiency. Inculcating more knowledge doesn’t mean that students grasp all knowledge what has been taught. On the contrary, students are able to grasp more knowledge when they have personal experiences. So going on the field trips are better than the studying in the classroom.
In conclusion, going to the filed trips would better benefit to student to better understand. It is able to stimulate interest of learning and improve the efficiency. Children would find the new knowledge from the daily life. Therefore, going on the filed trips is the best way for education.
2016-05-13 16:55:27 来自 托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
【作业一】 请根据周一到周四的训练,修改之前的内容,写一篇完整的中文作文。作文可以包括一个背景段、两个理由段、一个让步段和一个总结段,也可以包括一个背景段、三个理由段和一个总结段。理由可以和之前用的理由相同,也可以不同。 随着经济的迅猛发展,教育的重要性也在日益凸显。多数先进和发展中国家都渴望能够培育出一个诺贝尔得奖人为国争光。如果人们不能受到良好的教育,就不能跟上社会发展的脚步,很容易被激烈的竞争淘汰。这就需要不断反思我们的教育方法和教育理念。是实地学习还是在教室学习对孩子们的教育更好呢?我认为,显然,实地学习是一个更为卓越的教育方式。 首先,实地学习能够帮助学生更好地理解所学课程。很多学科的知识都是来源于日常生活当中。如果仅仅从课本和视频中了解这些内容,不仅抽象而且晦涩难懂。而实地学习给了学生亲自感受这些知识的机会,从而使得抽象的知识变得具体。例如,很多学校开设有天文学课程,但他们中的大部分都只是给学生展示一些关于宇宙的图片或者视频。如果学校能够将课程安排到晚上,通过天文望远镜让他们实际观测他们头顶的星空有多么浩瀚而迷人,就可以帮助他们更好地理解课本上的知识。这种实地学习使得所学的知识变得非常形象,因而更容易为学生所理解,也就提高了学习的效率。因此,与在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 另外,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。如果仅仅在教室里学习课本知识,学生很容易感到乏味,导致对这门课程的兴趣降低。而实地学习比课堂学习更有趣也更生动,对于学生的吸引力也更强。在中学时期,我们曾经选修过一门叫做植物鉴赏的课程。每次上课的时候,老师就会组织我们来到学校的花园,对一些比较有代表性的植物进行辨认和讲解,并鼓励我们把它们都画下来,做成一本画册。现在,我仍然保留着这本画册,每次我翻开它,仿佛都能闻到微微潮湿的空气混杂着泥土的清香,还有各种各样的花草独特的味道。这让我始终保持着对植物的好奇心和对大自然的热爱。显然,正是一次又一次的实地学习帮助我更好地了解了各类植物的特征和魅力,并且激发了我对这门课程的兴趣。因此,和在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 有人认为在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。因为在教室学习学生的注意力可以更集中,对于知识的理解也会更加有效。但是注意力集中只是导致好的学习效果的一个方面,如果没有实地学习增强孩子们对于抽象概念的理解,注意力再集中也对学习知识起不到任何作用。因此,实地学习在教育孩子的过程中更重要。 总之,实地学习不仅可以帮助学生更好地理解所学知识,还能激发学生的学习兴趣,突显了知识的性质和相应教育方法的先进性。因此,我更赞同孩子应当多进行实地学习。 【作业二】 请将你写的中文作文翻译成英文。 Along with the dash for economic growth has come the increasing magnitude of education. To have a native - born Nobel laureate is what most developing and developed countries crave for as an unparalleled honor. If people acquire undesirable education, they cannot abreast with the steps of social development and easy to be eliminated in the fierce competition, which impels us continuously to rethink our educational approaches and philosophy. Is going on field trips better for children’s education or staying in the classroom at school? I perceive, obviously, that attending field trips is a more excellent method of education. To begin with, going on field trips is conductive to students’ better understanding of the knowledge they learned. It’s generally considered that quite a little knowledge is derived from our routine life. And that is not only abstract but impenetrable if we just study them in our textbooks or videos. While going on field trips offers us a precious opportunity to contact the knowledge by ourselves, which turns abstraction into concretization. For instance, plenty of universities open courses of astronomy. Most of them, however, are merely offer a few pictures or videos of universe. If schools arrange astronomy course at night, and afford the students some astronomical telescopes to have them observe the starry skies above them, not only can it help students understand the textbooks’ content more effortlessly, but also arouse their interests about the course. This learning method will make knowledge we known vivid, so the students can comprehend it easily, which improves the efficiency of their studying. Consequently, going on field trips is better than staying in the classroom at school during the learning period. Secondary, going on field is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. It is universally known that learning textbook knowledge in the classroom merely may contribute to students’ boredom, which results in their reducing interests to the course. While attending field trips has stronger attraction to students for it’s more fascinating and vivid. During my high school, I ever take a certain course called Plant Appreciation. Every time I attended class, the teacher would invite students to go to school’s garden and illustrate a few plants for us. In addition, she proposed some suggestion that we could draw the flora and write some explanations about them, make a picture book finally. I still remain the book now. When I flip it, it seems that there is some moist smell from an April shower or the unfolding of a bud. The universe is its temple. It unfolds into the numberless flowers of spring. It waves in the branches of trees and the green blades of grass, which attract me for all time. Obviously, it is the constant field trips that assist me know the characteristics and charming of varieties of plants, and arouse my interests about the course. Thereby, it can achieve better that attending practical study than learning in classroom. Some people hold the view that studying in classrooms is better than going on field trips for children’s education, since they perceive students would be more concentrated and have a more effective learning in doors. Concentration, however, is just a certain respect which contributes to a favorable study results. Thereby, being concentrated is not functional in studying knowledge without attending field trips reinforcing students’ comprehension of abstraction. Consequently, going on field trips is more paramount for children’s education. In brief, not only can going on field trips assist students to understand knowledge better, but also arouse their interests of learning, highlights progressiveness in the nature of knowledge and corresponding methods of education. Consequently, I am favorable to studying field trips.
As the nation’s economy soars, chinese society is increasingly diverse. Education plays a vital role most of the time, nowadays, the Department of Education has attached great importance to the development of educations. A large number of resources are put into a lot of projects in education, giving a boost to the reform in education. As always, the discussions relating to education are still on the lips of many individuals. For instance, which one is the better way to teach children, studying in the classroom or going on filed trips? From my perspective, I prefer going on filed trips. There are 2 reasons below. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to a better understanding of knowledge for students. When we study in the classroom, for instance, we can only acquire knowledge through books and coursewares. However, we can get rid of the restriction of classrooms, observe objects closely and touch them in person in order to come to a better understanding when we go on field trips. For example, my physics teacher leads us to the playground to do an experiment which can help us to be well aware of the Universal Gravitation in that simply talking about the gravity is pale. The field study is more vivid and interesting than learning with just books or computer courseware. Hence, compared with learning in the classroom, field study is better for the child's education. Secondary, going on field trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. Interests, as the saying goes, are the best teachers. Going on field trips is better to children's education if it is able to motivate children's curiosity of study. My teacher leaded us to the playground to make experiments during the middle school chemistry class. I had great interests in chemical reactions, so I helped my teacher with them. I felt excited when I observed the objects changing in the beaker. Before long, chemistry courses became my favorite and the memory of this activity was reserved. This example indicates that going on field trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. Many students, I maintain, are excited when they talk about experiments. So for my money, going on field trips has a more positive influence on children. Some people maintain that studying in classroom is better because they believe studying outside may dispense our attention and reduce efficiency. Actually, no evidence indicates that learning in the classroom can entirely draw our attentions. Whether the course is efficient or not depends on teachers. In terms of the advantages of learning outdoors, learning in the classroom is no match for going on field trips which can provide us with a better feeling of the subject. In a netshell, going on filed trips acquires a better understanding of what students have learned. In addition, it also does better in stirring up students’ inquisitiveness about knowledge and stimulating children’s learning initiative, which have an advantage of spreading knowledge, as well as contributing to the children’s education.
Homework 1 百年大计,教育为本。随着社会的发展,人们对教育的关注越来越多,投入的时间和金钱比重也越来越大,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直也来,社会上都不乏涉及教育的讨论。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学的知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助于书本,显得枯燥乏味,效果也不好。但如果可以将我们的课堂放到教室之外,学生可以摆脱教室和书本的限制,通过外观、声音、味道等感官近距离接触所学的东西,这非常有助于学生对知识的理解。例如语文课上《醉翁亭记》,如果老师仅仅是对学生讲解书本上所写的文字内容的话,学生并不一定能够很好的理解欧阳修文字中描写的景色,只能空凭想象。但如果这节课可以实地到醉翁亭去上,那就完全不一样了,老师可以对照课文将周围的景物一一讲解,非常有利于学生对课文中的景色以及作者思想的理解。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。初中的时候我们的化学课上,老师带我们去实验室上课,我们得以真正实践那些在我们课本上出现的实验,并观察它们的现象,就像一次探险。这样的实践对于我的帮助非常大,我深深地爱上了化学这门课。从初中到高中,化学都是我学的最好的学科。相比之下,对那些只在教室里纸上谈兵的课程我就不是那么喜欢,学的也不是那么好。这个例子说明,我们去实验室上化学课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有些人可能认为在教室学习必实地学习对孩子的教育更好,他们觉得实地学习可能会造成学生完全抛弃书本理论知识的学习。事实上,只要老师能够良好的结合书本与实践,这是完全可以避免的。而实地学习具有教室学习无可比拟的优点,所以这对孩子的教育更有利。 简言之,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都更益于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 Homework 2 As is known to all, education is the bed rock of a country’s long term development. With the development of society, people begin to pay more and more attention on education. An increasing investment of time and fund has also been spent on education. This encourages reforms and innovations on the ways of education. There has always been plentiful discussion about education. For instance, which is a better way to educate our children, to study in the classroom or to go on a field study? From my own opinion, field study does more benefits on students’ education. Here are my reasons. To begin with, field study is conductive to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Studying in the classroom, students can only learn with the aid of text book. It seems dull and boring, as well as bad effect. But if we put our lesson to the outside, students can get rid of the classroom’s constraint. They may touch the things they’ve learned through their senses, such as appearances, sounds and tastes. It contributes their understanding a lot. For instance, a Chinese class which is teaching “Account of Inebriate Pavilion”, if teachers only read the text book to the students, students may not get a good comprehension on the beautiful scene and Ouyang Xiu’s thoughts indicated in the article. They may only depend on their poor imagination. However, if the class is taught in Inebriate Pavilion, there would be a totally difference. Teachers can make every scenery written in the article to match the mountains, rivers around. It benefits the students’ understanding a lot. This way is more vivid than classroom based only on textbook and impress students more. Consequently, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Next, field study is more likely to arouse one’s curiosity of studying. As the old saying, interest is the best teacher. If the field study performance better on exciting the students’ interests, this method benefits children more than studying in the classroom. During my junior time, my chemistry teacher always put classes in the lab so that we could practice those experiments on our textbook and observe the phenomena of them. Experiment made everything in the chemistry class like an exploration. This practice helped me a lot. I got fascinated with chemistry. From my junior to senior high, chemistry was my best subject. I always got a full score. Relatively, I was not interest with those class without field study. I performance fair on those ones. This example illustrates that field study can truly improve students’ interests in study. I believe that many of the students have the same experience with me. Therefore, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study does more benefits on children’s education. Some people may believe that studying in the classroom has more benefits on students’ education than field study. They hold the opinion that field study has possibility to cause children to override theoretical learning. As a matter of fact, if the teacher can combine textbook learning and practice well, this circumstance can be avoided. Field study has advantages which studying in the classroom can’t compare with so that field study does more help on students’ learning than studying in the classroom. Briefly, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. It also innovates their interest on study better and pull up their activity on study. These are more beneficial to realize the purpose of knowledge’s spreading through education. Consequently, it contributes a lot to children’s education.
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9# The future of the country hinges on how much attention put into the education per se. Therefore, which kinds of education module is better for children is a question, like going on field trips or stay at classroom, which one is better? In my opinion, going on field trips are beneficial to students. First and foremost, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom. Study at school, books and computer software intended for educational use are the only tools for children to understand what they have learned. Whereas, during the field trips, without the limit of classroom, they could approach what they learned, bear in mind what they learned and what they saw and what they touched. For instance, a biology class which teacher will introduce kinds of animals to students. In a zoo or on a field trips, they will remember and distinguish animals by their own feel, Therefore, I believe going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. Secondly, going on field trips will expand students’ eyesight, if they see the magnificent world, their life will full of power. I still remember that, a sunny autumn day, my painting teacher organized us to the Qi Xia temple see the maple leaf, feel the beautiful scenery in poems. It’s hard to describe with language. Every sense I had seen was a miracle by nature. No photos, paintings or poems I ever seen could depict ten percent of it. I could paint better, because I want to paint like this one day. In conclusion, going on field trips are useful expend students’ scope. And understand what they learn, that’s beneficial to improve them study interested, for the sake of education, going on field trips are greater
The past several decades have witnessed that the world’s economy is booming and more finances can be poured into education, especially in the places where students can acquire knowledge and master skills. Along with this phenomenon comes a heated discussion: is going on field trips better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school? As for me, I have no doubt in proclaiming the importance of the former and I would explore the rationalities behind this idea in this following paragraphs. To begin with, during the process of going on field trips, there must be curiousness and surprise that emerge one after another, which really can help to deepen our understanding of subjects. It is because children would definitely refer data or seek help from teachers to solve their puzzles that are hard to find answers from textbooks. A good case in point is when I was studying the college subject, Chemical Reaction Engineering, its principles and formulas were so confusing that I could hardly be preoccupied with it. But the field trip after two-mouth study of theories offered me a chance to observe the experimental apparatuses whose complexity and precision incited my interests and it is not until that time that I was willing to specialize in it. In addition, conducting field trips are conducive to fostering students’ abilities of operation and adapting to social development. There is no denying that modern enterprises put an emphasis on employees’ practical skills and ability to communicate that can hardly be mastered in the classroom. Conversely, in field trips not only can we acquire journeymen’s wealth of work experience, but also we can master the essential social living principle. Recently I have read an appalling fact that the state-owned and private firms are more willing to employ those of rich social experience than the excellent students in academics. Is it a compelling case that explains why internship is so important to us? Admittedly, I’m not denying that the classroom learning should be never overlooked, for it lays a foundation for our following research and work. However, studying basic lessons in class, the basic requirement for comprehensive development of students, is far from enough for them to take a place in the highly competitive society. Moreover, only going on field trips can students have a deep understanding of curriculum and develop essential capabilities which is of great importance to their future. To put it into nutshell, I can safely draw a conclusion that children can learn much from going on field trips than staying in the classroom at school. Just as an idiom that goes, no practice, no gain in one’s wit. The most effective way for people to master knowledge is to go on field trips to put what we have learned into practice.


安装 QQ