Angelina Chun 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9#
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons.

To begin with, field trip is conducive to help student get better comprehension of what they learned.When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory.There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems.On the contrary, field trip provide students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems.Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done.Therefore, field trip is of great impotence for students.To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently,it inspired me a lot.After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard.That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again,it proves how important the field trip is for students.To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help student to understand the knowledge better.

Plus,field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly,we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study.Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, I have to say I love auditing and I made myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me.Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom.Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom

Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip.They said that field trip in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government.It just takes some time.But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage over leaning in the classroom.That is irreplaceable.Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom.

To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom.
2016-05-13 09:21:50 来自 托福作文咩
评论
1 楼
1.最后一段第二行 these 打错啦。 2.每句话句号结束后,打一个空格,不然一放到word里看全是红色波浪线...... 3.因为我们分段完成的作文,总字数超了。(我也是)在改精简点就好了。
2016-05-13 09:37
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 好好好!我再修改修改谢谢么么~
2016-05-13 09:40
评论
3 楼
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is[这里可以用一些短语啊my point is感觉表述不太大气] field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons. To begin with, field trip is conducive to help[ing/to是介词] student[s] get better comprehension of what they learned. When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory. There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems. On the contrary, field trip provide[s] students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems. Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater[master] the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done. Therefore, field trip is of great impotence[importance] for students. To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently, it inspired me a lot. After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard. That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again, it proves how important the field trip is for students. To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help[ing] student to understand the knowledge better. Plus, field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly, we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study. Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, [和上一段表达一样可以换其他形式]I have to say I love auditing and I made[这一句前后时态不一致] myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me. Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve [宾语呢] dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom. Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip. They said that field trip [宾从没谓语] in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government. It just takes some time. But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage[s] over leaning in the classroom. That is irreplaceable. Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom. To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they [have] learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom. 字数确实好多600+再精简一点
2016-05-13 20:15
评论
4 楼
评论 3楼 好谢谢惠普!么么哒❤️
2016-05-13 20:25
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
【作业一】 正如一句名言所说:“海内存知己,天涯若比邻”。很多人都认为真正的友谊会超越距离的限制。那么对幸福感来说,到底是和小部分人维持长久的友谊更重要,还是能轻松交到新朋友更重要呢? 我认为和小部分人维持长久的友谊更重要。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助书本和课件学习,而在实地学习的过程中,学生可以摆脱教室的限制,通过观察、操作、调试等各个方面更真切的理解所学的东西,而不只是停留在书本上。例如一堂物理实验课,同学们要亲手做实验。如果这节课是在实验室里进行,学生就可以真切的接触到各种实验仪器,不仅可以学习到实验仪器的用法,还能观察分析实验过程中出现不同现象的原因,得出不同的结论。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。记得小学的时候有一节作文课,春天刚到,油菜花开满遍地。老师就组织我们春游,穿梭在田野间欣赏怡人的风景领略春天的魅力。自然界中的一切对我来说都那么有趣,似乎每一个景物都值得去仔细观察。后来作文课就成为我最喜欢的一门课,每次上课,我都满心期待。如今虽然过去很多年了,这节课的场景依然历历在目。相比之下,对那些在教室里上过的作文课的记忆却早已不在了。这个例子说明,我们去实地上课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有人认为与在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。这是因为实地学习容易导致学生分神,而在教室学习相对比较集中注意力。事实上,在教室学习方法单一,枯燥无味更容易让学生疲惫,不能更好地引起学生学习的兴趣。而实地学习具有教室学习无法比拟的优点,所以对孩子的教育更好。 总之,老朋友更加相互理解,和老朋友相处比较轻松自在,会感觉更加放松,这些对于快乐来讲是很重要的。因而,对于快乐或者幸福感来说,能和小部分人维持长久的友谊比能轻松交到新朋友更重要。 【作业二】 The level of education you received always determines the height you are. With the development of our society, education becomes more and more important topic, and the measure of which is also of the same importance. However, there has always been plentiful of arguments about education. Is the going on field trips or staying in the classroom l better for children’s education? In my opinion, the former is better; the two reasons were given below. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to understanding knowledge better. In the field trips, students can get rid of the classroom constraints, and comprehend what they have learned actually through observation, operation, commissioning. For example, in a physical experiment class, students should do the experiment by their hands. If in the lab, students can truly touch the various experimental instruments, not only can learn the usage of them, but also can observe and analysis the different phenomenon in order to come to different conclusions. Therefore students can understand more thoroughly. In a word, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. Secondary, going on field trips is better at stimulating one’s delight in learning. As the saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If going on field trips is better at stimulating one’s delight in learning, then it is good for children’s education. I remember that I had a writing task in primary school, spring has just arrived, and there were rape flowers everywhere. The teacher organized us to take a trip before we wrote. Everything in nature is so interesting to me when enjoying the beautiful scenery in field; it seems that every scene is worth my careful observation. Later, the composition class became my favorite class. Although that class has gone for many years, the scene is still visible in my mind. This example shows that when going to the field trip, students will feel more interesting about learning. Therefore I believe going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. Some people may think that studying in classroom at school is better for children’s education than going on field trips. It is because that students could not concentrate on what they are learning. On the contrary, they have to face one thing what they should study. Actually, the measure of teaching in room is so single , boring that it makes them tired and do not arouse interest of study. However, going on field trips has more advantages, which is good for education. All in all, going on field trips is conducive to understanding knowledge better, and is better at stimulating one’s delight in learning, which also could gives rise to students’ interest of study. So, all of these are beneficial to the purpose of education of spread knowledge, and are good for children’s education.
As society develops, the increasing correlation between education and students’ personal success calls for improvement and innovation of education. Some who stick at traditional teaching methods insist on their students studying in the classroom, while other come up with a different kind of field trips. Personally, I think conducting field study may be better for students. Here are my reasons. First of all, field trips contribute to better understanding of the knowledge gained in class. Textbooks and handouts might be the only resources students could refer to if they just study indoors. Field study, removing the boundaries of classrooms, could allow students have a closer look at what they have learned in class. The appearance, sound, taste, texture and other aspects of an object could render a laudable service for students to get a better perception of it, and thus facilitate their learning. For instance, my history teacher who intended to teach us about the old ramparts in our city, took us to the suburb of Nanjing, where we watched and touched (got permissions already) the weathered stones. Standing on the old walls, we had a vivid knowledge of the structure and the materials they used. As we can see, field trips enable students to fell the authentic objects and to cultivate their insights. And no matter how graphical a picture in a book might be, it will never leave such a great impression on students. Thus, I believe that field trips are of greater significance as to study. Next, field trips are more likely to arouse students' curiosity of a subject. As the saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If field trips could stimulate students' delight in study, then field trips outweigh classroom learning. For instance, I have participated in a photography course and I found the theories of composition and color to be dull. One day our professor took us students to a garden with breath-taking landscapes. All of my classmates experimented with different camera settings to get the optimal image effect. Even when it was dark, we continued to try long exposures and light painting tirelessly. From then on, no classmates have played hooky or dozed off at class. As you can see, if students are given the chance to practice outdoors, they could gain hands-on experience and thus get inspired by the exploration. I guess most people may have the same experience. Therefore, I believe that, compared with studying in the classroom, field trips are better. Some people argue that studying in the classroom is better because students could concentrate on what they are learning when they stay in the classroom, and thus could learn systematically. In fact, students will fail to be absorbed if they feel bored, not to mention their solid grasp of knowledge. Admittedly, students will become too excited to think straight during field trips, but this problem could be solved if their teachers could guide them right there. In conclusion, field study, with its efficiency of maintaining students' interest and facilitating their absorption of knowledge, outshines in-class teaching method. Thus, I believe it is better for students.
With the society developing continuously, education has gradually become the primary problem to which people pay attention. Debates relating to which form of education is supposed to be chosen is never defficient. As always, people holds two opposite opinions. Some support the idea that going on foeld trips is more beneficial, while others think the conventional form--studying at classrooms is better. From my point of view, the former is my preference. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to what students have learned. Only theories can be learned in the classroom, which means we have to understand what we learn by the form of writing and pictures. Not only can we merely build a shallowIn contrast understanding, but also it is not comprenhensive at all. In contrast, going field trips contributes to students' mastering the knowledge better. At the same time, learning from overall aspects,we can have a concrete comprehension. Hence, we are bound to obtain a further understanding. For instance, once in a technology and technology class, we are ackonwledged to devise a small intelligent robot. There is no doubt that we can't even imagine its figures unless we learn it only by textbooks. Given a chance to go to the labarotary to do an experiment, we are sure to be able to look at its appearance carefully as well as know how it functions. In turn, we can gain inspiration from it, which is of great help to our design. As a matter of fact, this form of education like going on field trips is beneficial to our study. Compared with studying in classrooms, it is more vivid and persuasive. Therefore, from the perspecttive of facilitating study, going on field trips does more good to study. Secondary, going on field trips is better at stimulating students' inquisitiveness about study. As a saying goes, interest is the best teacher. It can't be denied that going on fild trips has more evident advantages than studying in classrooms. It still occurs to me that when I was in primary school, we had a difffirent art class. Taken to the park where the scenery was extremely attractive, we couldn't control our excitement. We appreciated the beautiful spring, the fish swimming inthe pool and the grass coming up. So amazing were them that we couldn't wait to draw them on the papers. Obviously, this form of class made us more interested in drawing. With time passing by, I can still recalled the scene, which impressed me to a great extent. From this example, we realize that going on field trips strengthens student's passion in study and arouses their interest. Hence, as far as the effect on students' education is concerned, going on field trips beats studying in classrooms. Nevertheless, some are the supportors of the opinion that studying in classrooms is more beneficial to students' education, when compared to going on field trips. They assert that safety problems can't be ignored when it comes to going on field trips. Admittedly, this perspective seems resonable. But in fact, there is no evidence pointing to the fact that studying in classrooms is absolutely safe. Whether these potential threats happens depends more on if the teacher's organizition is cautious and if there is adequate defensive measures, rather than the place the study. Anything has its danger. However, the harmness can be totally avoided if we are more careful. Since going on field trips is such conducive to students' education, it is the better choice. To conclude, when compared with staying in classrooms, the advantages of going on field trips is more obvious. Not only can it contribute to students' understanding of what they learn, but also it stimulates their interest and passion for study. Thus, taken it into accout that it can improve the quality of education, going on field trips has greater effects on students' study than staying in classrooms.
Education is the basic construction for one country. People pay more attention and spent more to education,with the social development.This also leads to innovation and reformation in the area.There has always been plentiful of debate about education.Such as ,which manner can benefit children more, field trip or staying in classroom ?As for me, field trip does good to education more .There are the two reasons following. To begin with, field trips conducive to the better comprehension of children's education.Field trip give our children a chance to experience themselves which can stimulate them in various ways to improve comprehension. For example,when we learn anatomy,we cannot know the position of the organs only through books,as we don not establish a respond to form in 3 dimension. Furthermore it is more impressive after feel personally. Field trip of this kind is vivider than staying in classrooms reading books or just watching ppt. We can understand knowledge entirely. So field trips is a better means for education than staying in classroom. Secondary, field trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in study. As we all know, interest is the best teacher.if field trips can arouse children’s curiosity of study,it more suitable for them than staying in classroom. Once we learned to paint from life in spring meadow.It seemed things everywhere have just woken up and gleefully opened their eyes.Little blades of grass poke their little heads out of the ground.Flowers of all types blossomed - red as flame, pink as dawning-clouds, and white as snow. Feeling the beauty of nature we fell in love with painting and always looked forward to the lesson. Many years ago I still remember these scenery ,while time staying in classroom leaves nothing. It demonstrate we have higher spirit to study in trips .we all have the same experience that we will be extremely exited as soon as we go to trip. So field trips is better to children’s education compared to study in classroom. because the field has rate for some accident, while studying in the classroom is relatively safe.In fact, there is no data show that in the classroom learning is absolutely safe.Safety depends on the teacher's organization and management, if the teacher mismanage, learning in the classroom can also bring problem.Field study has the advantages which the classroom learning can't compare with, so it is better for the child's education. In brief ,field trip not only contributes more for students to understand the knowledge ,but also promote their study interest and drives their activeness.All of these help education to deliver knowledge.So it is the better one to chose.
Recent years have witnessed a rapid development and profound transformation in education. Students have been able to access a more effective and novel way to study in the school. Some sociologists claim that it is better for children to have field lesson than only staying in a classroom. As far as I am concerned, the interpretation can be fully approved and I am going to elaborate my viewpoint below. First, doing field trip is conducive to a better understanding of knowledge that students have learned. Staying in a classroom, children cannot acquire an accurate and complete comprehension of subjects since they are unable to see and touch what they have learned. For example, my biology teacher used to bring us to do some field researches so as to make us understand the lessons more deeply. In that case, we always have opportunities to closely watch the shapes of various kinds of leaves and smell the different fragrances of flowers. All class have accessed to the vivid and direct information of vegetation which gives us an impressive impression that we will hardly forget. Second, doing field trip does better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness about study. Interests should be developed and boosted through a process of perceiving beauty by self-experience. Almost everything we do not know well will turns out to be more simple and understandable after observing it in the nature. As for me, I am a big fun of colleting butterfly specimen. Believe it or not, I was seldom aware of this creature before taking biology class. It was a sunny day and my biology teacher took us to a nearby garden to conduct a research on distinguishing different kinds of butterflies through their colorful wings. I learned for the first time that there existed such fabulous insects in the nature and soon got immersed in them. Since then, I have been trying my best to collect as many varicolored butterflies as I can and this becomes a part of my life. Admittedly, studying in classroom does also have some advantages. Students may avoid being bitten by some insects or injured during the field trip. Staying in the classroom can be safe. However, these problems can be easily solved by wearing some comfortable shoes or protective clothes. Meanwhile, teachers are able to impart a few notes on security before conducting the field practice. Thus, the benefits of field lesson can still not be compared and should be fully aware of. To put it in a nutshell, it is my opinion that going on field trips is necessary for students’ education. Not only can it conduce to a better understanding on knowledge but also stimulate students’ curiosity on study. In other words, this education type will do more help to students than staying in a classroom.

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ