Angelina Chun 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9#
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons.

To begin with, field trip is conducive to help student get better comprehension of what they learned.When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory.There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems.On the contrary, field trip provide students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems.Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done.Therefore, field trip is of great impotence for students.To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently,it inspired me a lot.After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard.That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again,it proves how important the field trip is for students.To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help student to understand the knowledge better.

Plus,field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly,we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study.Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, I have to say I love auditing and I made myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me.Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom.Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom

Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip.They said that field trip in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government.It just takes some time.But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage over leaning in the classroom.That is irreplaceable.Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom.

To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom.
2016-05-13 09:21:50 来自 托福作文咩
评论
1 楼
1.最后一段第二行 these 打错啦。 2.每句话句号结束后,打一个空格,不然一放到word里看全是红色波浪线...... 3.因为我们分段完成的作文,总字数超了。(我也是)在改精简点就好了。
2016-05-13 09:37
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 好好好!我再修改修改谢谢么么~
2016-05-13 09:40
评论
3 楼
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is[这里可以用一些短语啊my point is感觉表述不太大气] field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons. To begin with, field trip is conducive to help[ing/to是介词] student[s] get better comprehension of what they learned. When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory. There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems. On the contrary, field trip provide[s] students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems. Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater[master] the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done. Therefore, field trip is of great impotence[importance] for students. To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently, it inspired me a lot. After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard. That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again, it proves how important the field trip is for students. To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help[ing] student to understand the knowledge better. Plus, field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly, we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study. Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, [和上一段表达一样可以换其他形式]I have to say I love auditing and I made[这一句前后时态不一致] myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me. Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve [宾语呢] dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom. Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip. They said that field trip [宾从没谓语] in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government. It just takes some time. But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage[s] over leaning in the classroom. That is irreplaceable. Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom. To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they [have] learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom. 字数确实好多600+再精简一点
2016-05-13 20:15
评论
4 楼
评论 3楼 好谢谢惠普!么么哒❤️
2016-05-13 20:25
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
As the nation’s economy soars, chinese society is increasingly diverse. Education plays a vital role most of the time, nowadays, the Department of Education has attached great importance to the development of educations. A large number of resources are put into a lot of projects in education, giving a boost to the reform in education. As always, the discussions relating to education are still on the lips of many individuals. For instance, which one is the better way to teach children, studying in the classroom or going on filed trips? From my perspective, I prefer going on filed trips. There are 2 reasons below. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to a better understanding of knowledge for students. When we study in the classroom, for instance, we can only acquire knowledge through books and coursewares. However, we can get rid of the restriction of classrooms, observe objects closely and touch them in person in order to come to a better understanding when we go on field trips. For example, my physics teacher leads us to the playground to do an experiment which can help us to be well aware of the Universal Gravitation in that simply talking about the gravity is pale. The field study is more vivid and interesting than learning with just books or computer courseware. Hence, compared with learning in the classroom, field study is better for the child's education. Secondary, going on field trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. Interests, as the saying goes, are the best teachers. Going on field trips is better to children's education if it is able to motivate children's curiosity of study. My teacher leaded us to the playground to make experiments during the middle school chemistry class. I had great interests in chemical reactions, so I helped my teacher with them. I felt excited when I observed the objects changing in the beaker. Before long, chemistry courses became my favorite and the memory of this activity was reserved. This example indicates that going on field trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. Many students, I maintain, are excited when they talk about experiments. So for my money, going on field trips has a more positive influence on children. Some people maintain that studying in classroom is better because they believe studying outside may dispense our attention and reduce efficiency. Actually, no evidence indicates that learning in the classroom can entirely draw our attentions. Whether the course is efficient or not depends on teachers. In terms of the advantages of learning outdoors, learning in the classroom is no match for going on field trips which can provide us with a better feeling of the subject. In a netshell, going on filed trips acquires a better understanding of what students have learned. In addition, it also does better in stirring up students’ inquisitiveness about knowledge and stimulating children’s learning initiative, which have an advantage of spreading knowledge, as well as contributing to the children’s education.
Homework 1 百年大计,教育为本。随着社会的发展,人们对教育的关注越来越多,投入的时间和金钱比重也越来越大,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直也来,社会上都不乏涉及教育的讨论。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学的知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助于书本,显得枯燥乏味,效果也不好。但如果可以将我们的课堂放到教室之外,学生可以摆脱教室和书本的限制,通过外观、声音、味道等感官近距离接触所学的东西,这非常有助于学生对知识的理解。例如语文课上《醉翁亭记》,如果老师仅仅是对学生讲解书本上所写的文字内容的话,学生并不一定能够很好的理解欧阳修文字中描写的景色,只能空凭想象。但如果这节课可以实地到醉翁亭去上,那就完全不一样了,老师可以对照课文将周围的景物一一讲解,非常有利于学生对课文中的景色以及作者思想的理解。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或者电脑课件更生动,学生的印象也更深,因而理解的更透彻。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其次,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。初中的时候我们的化学课上,老师带我们去实验室上课,我们得以真正实践那些在我们课本上出现的实验,并观察它们的现象,就像一次探险。这样的实践对于我的帮助非常大,我深深地爱上了化学这门课。从初中到高中,化学都是我学的最好的学科。相比之下,对那些只在教室里纸上谈兵的课程我就不是那么喜欢,学的也不是那么好。这个例子说明,我们去实验室上化学课的话,学生会觉得像探险一样有趣,因而学习的兴致更高。相信许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听到要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴致昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有些人可能认为在教室学习必实地学习对孩子的教育更好,他们觉得实地学习可能会造成学生完全抛弃书本理论知识的学习。事实上,只要老师能够良好的结合书本与实践,这是完全可以避免的。而实地学习具有教室学习无可比拟的优点,所以这对孩子的教育更有利。 简言之,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都更益于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 Homework 2 As is known to all, education is the bed rock of a country’s long term development. With the development of society, people begin to pay more and more attention on education. An increasing investment of time and fund has also been spent on education. This encourages reforms and innovations on the ways of education. There has always been plentiful discussion about education. For instance, which is a better way to educate our children, to study in the classroom or to go on a field study? From my own opinion, field study does more benefits on students’ education. Here are my reasons. To begin with, field study is conductive to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Studying in the classroom, students can only learn with the aid of text book. It seems dull and boring, as well as bad effect. But if we put our lesson to the outside, students can get rid of the classroom’s constraint. They may touch the things they’ve learned through their senses, such as appearances, sounds and tastes. It contributes their understanding a lot. For instance, a Chinese class which is teaching “Account of Inebriate Pavilion”, if teachers only read the text book to the students, students may not get a good comprehension on the beautiful scene and Ouyang Xiu’s thoughts indicated in the article. They may only depend on their poor imagination. However, if the class is taught in Inebriate Pavilion, there would be a totally difference. Teachers can make every scenery written in the article to match the mountains, rivers around. It benefits the students’ understanding a lot. This way is more vivid than classroom based only on textbook and impress students more. Consequently, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. Next, field study is more likely to arouse one’s curiosity of studying. As the old saying, interest is the best teacher. If the field study performance better on exciting the students’ interests, this method benefits children more than studying in the classroom. During my junior time, my chemistry teacher always put classes in the lab so that we could practice those experiments on our textbook and observe the phenomena of them. Experiment made everything in the chemistry class like an exploration. This practice helped me a lot. I got fascinated with chemistry. From my junior to senior high, chemistry was my best subject. I always got a full score. Relatively, I was not interest with those class without field study. I performance fair on those ones. This example illustrates that field study can truly improve students’ interests in study. I believe that many of the students have the same experience with me. Therefore, comparing with studying in the classroom, field study does more benefits on children’s education. Some people may believe that studying in the classroom has more benefits on students’ education than field study. They hold the opinion that field study has possibility to cause children to override theoretical learning. As a matter of fact, if the teacher can combine textbook learning and practice well, this circumstance can be avoided. Field study has advantages which studying in the classroom can’t compare with so that field study does more help on students’ learning than studying in the classroom. Briefly, field study is of great help to students’ better understanding of what they have learned. It also innovates their interest on study better and pull up their activity on study. These are more beneficial to realize the purpose of knowledge’s spreading through education. Consequently, it contributes a lot to children’s education.
As society develops, the increasing correlation between education and students’ personal success calls for improvement and innovation of education. Some who stick at traditional teaching methods insist on their students studying in the classroom, while other come up with a different kind of field trips. Personally, I think conducting field study may be better for students. Here are my reasons. First of all, field trips contribute to better understanding of the knowledge gained in class. Textbooks and handouts might be the only resources students could refer to if they just study indoors. Field study, removing the boundaries of classrooms, could allow students have a closer look at what they have learned in class. The appearance, sound, taste, texture and other aspects of an object could render a laudable service for students to get a better perception of it, and thus facilitate their learning. For instance, my history teacher who intended to teach us about the old ramparts in our city, took us to the suburb of Nanjing, where we watched and touched (got permissions already) the weathered stones. Standing on the old walls, we had a vivid knowledge of the structure and the materials they used. As we can see, field trips enable students to fell the authentic objects and to cultivate their insights. And no matter how graphical a picture in a book might be, it will never leave such a great impression on students. Thus, I believe that field trips are of greater significance as to study. Next, field trips are more likely to arouse students' curiosity of a subject. As the saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If field trips could stimulate students' delight in study, then field trips outweigh classroom learning. For instance, I have participated in a photography course and I found the theories of composition and color to be dull. One day our professor took us students to a garden with breath-taking landscapes. All of my classmates experimented with different camera settings to get the optimal image effect. Even when it was dark, we continued to try long exposures and light painting tirelessly. From then on, no classmates have played hooky or dozed off at class. As you can see, if students are given the chance to practice outdoors, they could gain hands-on experience and thus get inspired by the exploration. I guess most people may have the same experience. Therefore, I believe that, compared with studying in the classroom, field trips are better. Some people argue that studying in the classroom is better because students could concentrate on what they are learning when they stay in the classroom, and thus could learn systematically. In fact, students will fail to be absorbed if they feel bored, not to mention their solid grasp of knowledge. Admittedly, students will become too excited to think straight during field trips, but this problem could be solved if their teachers could guide them right there. In conclusion, field study, with its efficiency of maintaining students' interest and facilitating their absorption of knowledge, outshines in-class teaching method. Thus, I believe it is better for students.
【作业一】 请根据周一到周四的训练,修改之前的内容,写一篇完整的中文作文。作文可以包括一个背景段、两个理由段、一个让步段和一个总结段,也可以包括一个背景段、三个理由段和一个总结段。理由可以和之前用的理由相同,也可以不同。 【作业二】 请将你写的中文作文翻译成英文。 随着现在社会的进步,以及教育在国家发展中占据着重要的地位,现在国家对教育越发的重视了。投入的教育资金也在不断的上升,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直以来,教育都是社会的热点话题。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助书本和课件学习,而在实地学习的过程中,学生可以摆脱教室的限制,近距离的观察所要掌握的知识,通过各个方面来获取书本上所没有的内容,从而有利于深入理解。例如一堂有关春游的作文课,老师要带着学生去感受春天大自然的气息让同学们记录下春游过程中的愉快经历。如果这节课是在野外进行,学生就可以真实地感受到大自然中春的味道,不仅可以实地观察到各种动植物的生长状态,还可以在实地观赏的过程中留下美好的记忆,从而来记录出整个有关春游的话题,给作文的完成提供了真实的材料。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或是想象来完成作文更生动形象,学生的印象也更深,因而写作文也更加容易,题材也更加真实。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其实,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。我还记得小学的时候有一节语文作文课,老师带我们春游。我们在河边嬉戏玩耍,看蝴蝶翩翩起舞,欣赏鱼儿水中游,观看大自然中的一切,一切都显得那么有趣。似乎每一处有春天的味道都想去捕捉,每一个细节都想抓住。后来我渐渐爱上了写作,从生活中发现事物,记录事物。如今虽然过去很多年了,这节课的场景依然历历在目。相比之下,对那些在教室里上过的作文课的记忆却早已不在了。这个例子说明,我们去实地上作文课的话,学生会觉得在观察的过程中很有趣味性,因为学习的兴致更高。相信有许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴质昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有人认为与在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。这是因为在教室学习学生更容易集中注意在课堂上,而在实地学习中学生容易分散。事实上,并没有数据表明在教室学习学生的注意力更容易集中,课堂注意力集中的情况往往和学生的年龄,以及老师上课的方式相关。如果上课的方式太过于沉闷,学生的注意力也无法长时间集中。相反,在实地学习的这种方式容易让学生们更加活跃,积极参与到课程之中。所以,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。 简单地说,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都有利于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 As the nation’s economy soars, education plays a vital role all the time, nowadays, the Department of Education has attached great importance to the development of education. A large number of resources are put into a lot of projects in education, giving a boost to the reform in education. As always, the discussions relating to education are still on the lips of many individuals. For instance, which one is the better way to teach children, studying in the classroom or going on filed trips? Form my perspective, I prefer going on filed trips. Two reasons are as follows. First of all, going on filed trips contributes to a better understanding of what the students have learned. Students can only be provided with books and courseware when they study in classrooms. However, going on a filed trips produces a sizable impact on getting rid of limitations from learning environment, such as looking more closely at the information, obtaining the knowledge from different perspectives, which take an advantage of the better understanding of what students have learned. Take a composition lesson on the subject of spring breaks for example, teachers have an opportunity to lead the students to smell the roses and give the duty to record the entire sequence of events. Studying in the natural habitat, pupils are easier to generate the real feeling from nature. Not only can they observe the growth of plants and animals of filed trips, but also they may hold deep impressions of the overall processes, making them more accessible to write down the composition with the topic of spring walk by providing the authentic material. The way to finish the composition on filed trips is more vivid than in classrooms by books and imaginations, with more impressions. As a result, writing a good essay is more convenient and collected examples become more real. To sum up, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. Secondly, going on filed trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in knowledge. Interest is the best teacher, so goes the proverb. It is better to teach students by going on filed trips, which has an advantage of arousing students’ curiosity, than to impart knowledge in classrooms. In my memory, it was a composition class, the teacher took the classmates swim to the spring. We had a great time by the river side, with the butterflies dancing in the air and fish swimming in the water. The process of enjoying the nature made us quite interesting. It seemed that the flavor of spring was longed to be captured, every details had to be chased. I started to love writing, getting information from our life and recording everything. Many years have passed, I can still vividly recall this scene. On the contrary, the memories of the composition courses in the classroom are long gone. As we can see from the example, students can obtain more interesting experience from observation by going on filed trips to take the composition class, which contributes to the improvement of their interest in learning. I believe that many individuals have a similar experience, when told that they will go on filed trips, a cry of joy burst forth from the crowd. As a result, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. There is a wide perception that learning in classrooms is better, compared with going on file trips. As a result of the point that studying in classrooms is easier to attract students’ attentions, going on filed trips gives students extra time to distract their focus. In fact, no statistics indicates that taking courses in classrooms has an advantage of paying attention to the knowledge, the focus on class is often intimately linked to the age of students and the way of teaching pupils. Students are unable to focus on the class for a long time with a young age and a tedious arrangement. On the contrary, going on filed trips makes students more active, they would like to involve in the lesson. Consequently, going on filed trips is easier to arouse students’ curiosity. To put it simply, going on filed trips gains a better understanding of what students have learned, and the way it also does better in stirring up students’ inquisitiveness about knowledge and stimulating children’s learning initiative, which have an advantage of spreading knowledge, as well as contributing to the children’s education.
The process of modernization gives birth to educational methods diversified such as traditional class, field lesson, online course, and so forth. Accordingly, when it comes to education, there has always been plentiful of discussions about it. For example, which is more beneficial for students between classroom learning and field-based studying? Personally speaking, learning outside is do better because students can gain knowledge more vividly and initiatively. Following reasons elaborated upon my upper point. To begin with, field lesson is of great help to students to understand what they have learned on books. In terms of students, studying from teaching material, not only are they bald and abstract, but also not easily be acceptable. While combining the theory with practice, it is conducive to students to understand and utilize through observation, sound, taste and touch. To some extents, the significance of studying in the real scene cannot be exaggerated. For example, a physics course, a teacher inform students of light component and refraction. If this class was a field lesson, students can water in air and then observe the different color of a rainbow outside. Under this situation, students can understand the conception and principle theory of light. By contrast, in the class, through books, the light formation cannot be imaged easily and vigorously. Consequently, field lesson contributes to students in-deep studying and understanding. Secondary, field lesson is do better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness. Commonly, the regular means of teaching in class bored students, and by contrast, field lesson shows an amusing way in front of them. Generally speaking, interest is the best teacher. Once forming a habit due to interest and hobby, students can learn spontaneously. There is an example to my mind. I still remember one biology course when the teacher took us to marine park. We had seen the animals, such as polar bears, penguins, sharks, jellyfishes, which were introduced in books. The feeling of close encounter quite differed from that of learning. All the things--the cute shapes, fascinating characteristics and peculiar sound of those animals—incredibly attracted us. After that trip, our class built up study groups to learn the marine world actively. What fantastic the field lesson is. Some people consider that it is more efficiency of studying in classroom than of field lesson, because field-based learning is likely to distract students, especially for them who are lower self-control. Besides, taking part in outside class, they would hardly gain the relevant knowledge, and also spend time on what they should spend on school in the same time. Virtually, there is no evidence showing that daily learning in school is more effective than outside. However, students’ could not focus on the knowledge in practice, they cannot concentrate in class as well. At least, outside learning gives students more direct perception about what they learned. In a nutshell, field lesson impart knowledge to students profoundly and vividly. Simultaneously, this method stimulates students’ delight in studying and cultivate their enthusiasm. Therefore, field lesson is important for students to acquire knowledge.