Angelina Chun 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9#
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons.

To begin with, field trip is conducive to help student get better comprehension of what they learned.When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory.There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems.On the contrary, field trip provide students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems.Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done.Therefore, field trip is of great impotence for students.To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently,it inspired me a lot.After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard.That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again,it proves how important the field trip is for students.To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help student to understand the knowledge better.

Plus,field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly,we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study.Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, I have to say I love auditing and I made myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me.Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom.Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom

Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip.They said that field trip in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government.It just takes some time.But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage over leaning in the classroom.That is irreplaceable.Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom.

To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom.
2016-05-13 09:21:50 来自 托福作文咩
评论
1 楼
1.最后一段第二行 these 打错啦。 2.每句话句号结束后,打一个空格,不然一放到word里看全是红色波浪线...... 3.因为我们分段完成的作文,总字数超了。(我也是)在改精简点就好了。
2016-05-13 09:37
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 好好好!我再修改修改谢谢么么~
2016-05-13 09:40
评论
3 楼
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is[这里可以用一些短语啊my point is感觉表述不太大气] field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons. To begin with, field trip is conducive to help[ing/to是介词] student[s] get better comprehension of what they learned. When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory. There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems. On the contrary, field trip provide[s] students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems. Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater[master] the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done. Therefore, field trip is of great impotence[importance] for students. To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently, it inspired me a lot. After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard. That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again, it proves how important the field trip is for students. To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help[ing] student to understand the knowledge better. Plus, field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly, we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study. Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, [和上一段表达一样可以换其他形式]I have to say I love auditing and I made[这一句前后时态不一致] myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me. Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve [宾语呢] dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom. Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip. They said that field trip [宾从没谓语] in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government. It just takes some time. But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage[s] over leaning in the classroom. That is irreplaceable. Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom. To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they [have] learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom. 字数确实好多600+再精简一点
2016-05-13 20:15
评论
4 楼
评论 3楼 好谢谢惠普!么么哒❤️
2016-05-13 20:25
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
The process of modernization gives birth to educational methods diversified such as traditional class, field lesson, online course, and so forth. Accordingly, when it comes to education, there has always been plentiful of discussions about it. For example, which is more beneficial for students between classroom learning and field-based studying? Personally speaking, learning outside is do better because students can gain knowledge more vividly and initiatively. Following reasons elaborated upon my upper point. To begin with, field lesson is of great help to students to understand what they have learned on books. In terms of students, studying from teaching material, not only are they bald and abstract, but also not easily be acceptable. While combining the theory with practice, it is conducive to students to understand and utilize through observation, sound, taste and touch. To some extents, the significance of studying in the real scene cannot be exaggerated. For example, a physics course, a teacher inform students of light component and refraction. If this class was a field lesson, students can water in air and then observe the different color of a rainbow outside. Under this situation, students can understand the conception and principle theory of light. By contrast, in the class, through books, the light formation cannot be imaged easily and vigorously. Consequently, field lesson contributes to students in-deep studying and understanding. Secondary, field lesson is do better in stirring up students' inquisitiveness. Commonly, the regular means of teaching in class bored students, and by contrast, field lesson shows an amusing way in front of them. Generally speaking, interest is the best teacher. Once forming a habit due to interest and hobby, students can learn spontaneously. There is an example to my mind. I still remember one biology course when the teacher took us to marine park. We had seen the animals, such as polar bears, penguins, sharks, jellyfishes, which were introduced in books. The feeling of close encounter quite differed from that of learning. All the things--the cute shapes, fascinating characteristics and peculiar sound of those animals—incredibly attracted us. After that trip, our class built up study groups to learn the marine world actively. What fantastic the field lesson is. Some people consider that it is more efficiency of studying in classroom than of field lesson, because field-based learning is likely to distract students, especially for them who are lower self-control. Besides, taking part in outside class, they would hardly gain the relevant knowledge, and also spend time on what they should spend on school in the same time. Virtually, there is no evidence showing that daily learning in school is more effective than outside. However, students’ could not focus on the knowledge in practice, they cannot concentrate in class as well. At least, outside learning gives students more direct perception about what they learned. In a nutshell, field lesson impart knowledge to students profoundly and vividly. Simultaneously, this method stimulates students’ delight in studying and cultivate their enthusiasm. Therefore, field lesson is important for students to acquire knowledge.
【作业2】 With the remarkable progress of people’s living standard, getting a good quality of education seems to be a very important thing, as education accounts for the knowledge acquired now but also influence the ability performed in the future. When it comes to the way to educate children, there are usually two approaches: to study by going field trips or to study in classroom. As for me, I prefer to learn knowledge in a more practical way such as field trips rather than learning in classroom. And there are some reasons and examples to illustrate my point of view. First and foremost, studying by field trips is a good way of cultivating interest. Take myself as an example. When I was in middle school, I took a field trip in a biology class to take a close look at the plants; the plants are varied in different shapes , functions and sizes, which are very interesting to discover. This trip, however, made myself interested in plants and even shaped my career life. Currently I worked as a nutritionist assistant, for I found my interest in biology in the field trip ten years ago. Besides, field trip does better in stripping up one's inquisitiveness about knowledge. It would be a very good chance for people to corporate theory with way practice. In other words, learning knowledge by taking field trip enables students to learn knowledge in different aspects and learn it deeply; field trip is a good way to portray interior factors to allow people to get to know things better or even become interested in things. Last time when I was in sophomore, my art history professor required us to finish a research paper about comprehending Renaissance art style and technology. In order to gave us a better way to understand the masterpieces, he firstly worked us through all the basic drawing theories, then he took us to the national museum to see the exhibition of Renaissance art. During the exhibition, we had a precious chance to take a very look at the masterpieces by many famous artists, which was very helpful for us to understand the drawing style, material and technology. This case demonstrates that many things could be felt and understood only by experience and practice, therefore field trip is definitely a good choice to cultivate interest and learn things deeply. Admittedly, field trip can be transformed into an obstacle if students go out for study too often. To be precise, it is easier for students to be distracted by other factors happened around than to concentrate on the knowledge discovering, which may finally decrease the study efficiency. In other words, field trip, though, as a way of learning things deeply and comprehensively, could also influence students' learning process in an inefficient way. However, learning in the classroom would not have such a problem of distraction. Therefore it would be an optimal solution to corporate field trip with basic in-class session to acquire knowledge. To put it in a nutshell, clearly justified through above-mentioned reasons and examples, students are worth taking field trips to acquire knowledge than learning only through lessons in classroom, for the field trips enable students to have a better understanding of knowledge and also cultivate interest to shape their future lives.
With the society developing continuously, education has gradually become the primary problem to which people pay attention. Debates relating to which form of education is supposed to be chosen is never defficient. As always, people holds two opposite opinions. Some support the idea that going on foeld trips is more beneficial, while others think the conventional form--studying at classrooms is better. From my point of view, the former is my preference. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to what students have learned. Only theories can be learned in the classroom, which means we have to understand what we learn by the form of writing and pictures. Not only can we merely build a shallowIn contrast understanding, but also it is not comprenhensive at all. In contrast, going field trips contributes to students' mastering the knowledge better. At the same time, learning from overall aspects,we can have a concrete comprehension. Hence, we are bound to obtain a further understanding. For instance, once in a technology and technology class, we are ackonwledged to devise a small intelligent robot. There is no doubt that we can't even imagine its figures unless we learn it only by textbooks. Given a chance to go to the labarotary to do an experiment, we are sure to be able to look at its appearance carefully as well as know how it functions. In turn, we can gain inspiration from it, which is of great help to our design. As a matter of fact, this form of education like going on field trips is beneficial to our study. Compared with studying in classrooms, it is more vivid and persuasive. Therefore, from the perspecttive of facilitating study, going on field trips does more good to study. Secondary, going on field trips is better at stimulating students' inquisitiveness about study. As a saying goes, interest is the best teacher. It can't be denied that going on fild trips has more evident advantages than studying in classrooms. It still occurs to me that when I was in primary school, we had a difffirent art class. Taken to the park where the scenery was extremely attractive, we couldn't control our excitement. We appreciated the beautiful spring, the fish swimming inthe pool and the grass coming up. So amazing were them that we couldn't wait to draw them on the papers. Obviously, this form of class made us more interested in drawing. With time passing by, I can still recalled the scene, which impressed me to a great extent. From this example, we realize that going on field trips strengthens student's passion in study and arouses their interest. Hence, as far as the effect on students' education is concerned, going on field trips beats studying in classrooms. Nevertheless, some are the supportors of the opinion that studying in classrooms is more beneficial to students' education, when compared to going on field trips. They assert that safety problems can't be ignored when it comes to going on field trips. Admittedly, this perspective seems resonable. But in fact, there is no evidence pointing to the fact that studying in classrooms is absolutely safe. Whether these potential threats happens depends more on if the teacher's organizition is cautious and if there is adequate defensive measures, rather than the place the study. Anything has its danger. However, the harmness can be totally avoided if we are more careful. Since going on field trips is such conducive to students' education, it is the better choice. To conclude, when compared with staying in classrooms, the advantages of going on field trips is more obvious. Not only can it contribute to students' understanding of what they learn, but also it stimulates their interest and passion for study. Thus, taken it into accout that it can improve the quality of education, going on field trips has greater effects on students' study than staying in classrooms.
【作业一】 请根据周一到周四的训练,修改之前的内容,写一篇完整的中文作文。作文可以包括一个背景段、两个理由段、一个让步段和一个总结段,也可以包括一个背景段、三个理由段和一个总结段。理由可以和之前用的理由相同,也可以不同。 随着经济的迅猛发展,教育的重要性也在日益凸显。多数先进和发展中国家都渴望能够培育出一个诺贝尔得奖人为国争光。如果人们不能受到良好的教育,就不能跟上社会发展的脚步,很容易被激烈的竞争淘汰。这就需要不断反思我们的教育方法和教育理念。是实地学习还是在教室学习对孩子们的教育更好呢?我认为,显然,实地学习是一个更为卓越的教育方式。 首先,实地学习能够帮助学生更好地理解所学课程。很多学科的知识都是来源于日常生活当中。如果仅仅从课本和视频中了解这些内容,不仅抽象而且晦涩难懂。而实地学习给了学生亲自感受这些知识的机会,从而使得抽象的知识变得具体。例如,很多学校开设有天文学课程,但他们中的大部分都只是给学生展示一些关于宇宙的图片或者视频。如果学校能够将课程安排到晚上,通过天文望远镜让他们实际观测他们头顶的星空有多么浩瀚而迷人,就可以帮助他们更好地理解课本上的知识。这种实地学习使得所学的知识变得非常形象,因而更容易为学生所理解,也就提高了学习的效率。因此,与在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 另外,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。如果仅仅在教室里学习课本知识,学生很容易感到乏味,导致对这门课程的兴趣降低。而实地学习比课堂学习更有趣也更生动,对于学生的吸引力也更强。在中学时期,我们曾经选修过一门叫做植物鉴赏的课程。每次上课的时候,老师就会组织我们来到学校的花园,对一些比较有代表性的植物进行辨认和讲解,并鼓励我们把它们都画下来,做成一本画册。现在,我仍然保留着这本画册,每次我翻开它,仿佛都能闻到微微潮湿的空气混杂着泥土的清香,还有各种各样的花草独特的味道。这让我始终保持着对植物的好奇心和对大自然的热爱。显然,正是一次又一次的实地学习帮助我更好地了解了各类植物的特征和魅力,并且激发了我对这门课程的兴趣。因此,和在教室学习相比,实地学习更好。 有人认为在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。因为在教室学习学生的注意力可以更集中,对于知识的理解也会更加有效。但是注意力集中只是导致好的学习效果的一个方面,如果没有实地学习增强孩子们对于抽象概念的理解,注意力再集中也对学习知识起不到任何作用。因此,实地学习在教育孩子的过程中更重要。 总之,实地学习不仅可以帮助学生更好地理解所学知识,还能激发学生的学习兴趣,突显了知识的性质和相应教育方法的先进性。因此,我更赞同孩子应当多进行实地学习。 【作业二】 请将你写的中文作文翻译成英文。 Along with the dash for economic growth has come the increasing magnitude of education. To have a native - born Nobel laureate is what most developing and developed countries crave for as an unparalleled honor. If people acquire undesirable education, they cannot abreast with the steps of social development and easy to be eliminated in the fierce competition, which impels us continuously to rethink our educational approaches and philosophy. Is going on field trips better for children’s education or staying in the classroom at school? I perceive, obviously, that attending field trips is a more excellent method of education. To begin with, going on field trips is conductive to students’ better understanding of the knowledge they learned. It’s generally considered that quite a little knowledge is derived from our routine life. And that is not only abstract but impenetrable if we just study them in our textbooks or videos. While going on field trips offers us a precious opportunity to contact the knowledge by ourselves, which turns abstraction into concretization. For instance, plenty of universities open courses of astronomy. Most of them, however, are merely offer a few pictures or videos of universe. If schools arrange astronomy course at night, and afford the students some astronomical telescopes to have them observe the starry skies above them, not only can it help students understand the textbooks’ content more effortlessly, but also arouse their interests about the course. This learning method will make knowledge we known vivid, so the students can comprehend it easily, which improves the efficiency of their studying. Consequently, going on field trips is better than staying in the classroom at school during the learning period. Secondary, going on field is better at stimulating students’ delight in learning. It is universally known that learning textbook knowledge in the classroom merely may contribute to students’ boredom, which results in their reducing interests to the course. While attending field trips has stronger attraction to students for it’s more fascinating and vivid. During my high school, I ever take a certain course called Plant Appreciation. Every time I attended class, the teacher would invite students to go to school’s garden and illustrate a few plants for us. In addition, she proposed some suggestion that we could draw the flora and write some explanations about them, make a picture book finally. I still remain the book now. When I flip it, it seems that there is some moist smell from an April shower or the unfolding of a bud. The universe is its temple. It unfolds into the numberless flowers of spring. It waves in the branches of trees and the green blades of grass, which attract me for all time. Obviously, it is the constant field trips that assist me know the characteristics and charming of varieties of plants, and arouse my interests about the course. Thereby, it can achieve better that attending practical study than learning in classroom. Some people hold the view that studying in classrooms is better than going on field trips for children’s education, since they perceive students would be more concentrated and have a more effective learning in doors. Concentration, however, is just a certain respect which contributes to a favorable study results. Thereby, being concentrated is not functional in studying knowledge without attending field trips reinforcing students’ comprehension of abstraction. Consequently, going on field trips is more paramount for children’s education. In brief, not only can going on field trips assist students to understand knowledge better, but also arouse their interests of learning, highlights progressiveness in the nature of knowledge and corresponding methods of education. Consequently, I am favorable to studying field trips.