Angelina Chun 楼主
05-13
托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9
展开任务卡
#托福作文咩第 10 期 Day 9#
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons.

To begin with, field trip is conducive to help student get better comprehension of what they learned.When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory.There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems.On the contrary, field trip provide students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems.Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done.Therefore, field trip is of great impotence for students.To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently,it inspired me a lot.After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard.That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again,it proves how important the field trip is for students.To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help student to understand the knowledge better.

Plus,field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly,we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study.Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, I have to say I love auditing and I made myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me.Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom.Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom

Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip.They said that field trip in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government.It just takes some time.But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage over leaning in the classroom.That is irreplaceable.Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom.

To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom.
2016-05-13 09:21:50 来自 托福作文咩
评论
1 楼
1.最后一段第二行 these 打错啦。 2.每句话句号结束后,打一个空格,不然一放到word里看全是红色波浪线...... 3.因为我们分段完成的作文,总字数超了。(我也是)在改精简点就好了。
2016-05-13 09:37
评论
2 楼
评论 1 楼: 好好好!我再修改修改谢谢么么~
2016-05-13 09:40
评论
3 楼
Education can always earn enough attention from the public which means it is quite a hit that we discuss often. Recently, a debate about education methods is going on --- what method is on earth better to implement. The field trip or just learning in the classroom? My point is[这里可以用一些短语啊my point is感觉表述不太大气] field trip is way too better than learning in the classroom. My view is based on the following reasons. To begin with, field trip is conducive to help[ing/to是介词] student[s] get better comprehension of what they learned. When studying in classroom, students can only base on the textbook to understand and remember the theory. There is little possibility to use them in practice to solve problems. On the contrary, field trip provide[s] students opportunity to apply theory to solve problems. Commonly, we all know that it is the only standard to test whether you mater[master] the knowledge or not that you can use the theory to get problems done. Therefore, field trip is of great impotence[importance] for students. To ground on my own experience, I have taken a class called ERP recently, it inspired me a lot. After finishing it, I got a feeling deeply that the real business world is just the battlefield and I found that to run an entity is really hard. That means not everyone can be a distinguished CEO. Again, it proves how important the field trip is for students. To recap, I do believe that field trip contributes to help[ing] student to understand the knowledge better. Plus, field trip is better at stimulating student’s delight in knowledge. Commonly, we can only insist on one thing and be expert at it as long as we are driven by interest. Field trip haves advantage over learning in classroom that student can participate personally in that process which can arouse student’s curiosity of study. Based on that, field trip is way too better than study in classroom. To recall this last internship I made, I got assess to the actual auditing procedure the first time. After finishing it, [和上一段表达一样可以换其他形式]I have to say I love auditing and I made[这一句前后时态不一致] myself a commitment to be an outstanding auditor. Because of this experience, it is easier to learn advanced audit theory for me. Compared to the time without the internship, learning theory won't be that boring any more and it is more efficient. Field trip can make us improve [宾语呢] dramatically, which is beyond the limitation of just learning in classroom. Up to this point, I do stand for that field trip is better to students' study than learning in classroom Someone think that learning in the classroom is better than field trip. They said that field trip [宾从没谓语] in really inconvenient. Like, we can hardly get the appropriate field spot as well as sufficient resources for students. However, all that staff can be solved by school and government. It just takes some time. But, we have to emphasis that field trip have much more advantage[s] over leaning in the classroom. That is irreplaceable. Therefore, I do believe field trip is better than learning in the classroom. To recap, field trip can help student get a better comprehension about what they [have] learnt as well as can arouse their interests about learning. All theses can push the students to be proactive to improve themselves faster. It is long term beneficial for a student. Hence, I do believe that field trip does really take advantage over just learning in the classroom. 字数确实好多600+再精简一点
2016-05-13 20:15
评论
4 楼
评论 3楼 好谢谢惠普!么么哒❤️
2016-05-13 20:25
评论
我有话要说
托福作文咩
成员 1691 贴数 10848
进入小组 >>
其他同学作业
【作业一】 请根据周一到周四的训练,修改之前的内容,写一篇完整的中文作文。作文可以包括一个背景段、两个理由段、一个让步段和一个总结段,也可以包括一个背景段、三个理由段和一个总结段。理由可以和之前用的理由相同,也可以不同。 【作业二】 请将你写的中文作文翻译成英文。 随着现在社会的进步,以及教育在国家发展中占据着重要的地位,现在国家对教育越发的重视了。投入的教育资金也在不断的上升,这使得教育方式也不断得到创新变革。一直以来,教育都是社会的热点话题。例如,教室学习和实地学习相比,到底哪一种方式对孩子的教育更好?在我看来,实地学习对孩子的教育更好,理由有以下两个方面。 首先,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识。在教室里学习,学生只能借助书本和课件学习,而在实地学习的过程中,学生可以摆脱教室的限制,近距离的观察所要掌握的知识,通过各个方面来获取书本上所没有的内容,从而有利于深入理解。例如一堂有关春游的作文课,老师要带着学生去感受春天大自然的气息让同学们记录下春游过程中的愉快经历。如果这节课是在野外进行,学生就可以真实地感受到大自然中春的味道,不仅可以实地观察到各种动植物的生长状态,还可以在实地观赏的过程中留下美好的记忆,从而来记录出整个有关春游的话题,给作文的完成提供了真实的材料。这样的实地学习要比在教室里通过书本或是想象来完成作文更生动形象,学生的印象也更深,因而写作文也更加容易,题材也更加真实。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 其实,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。常言道,兴趣是最好的老师。如果实地学习更能够激发学生的兴趣的话,那这种方式就比在教室学习对孩子的教育更好。我还记得小学的时候有一节语文作文课,老师带我们春游。我们在河边嬉戏玩耍,看蝴蝶翩翩起舞,欣赏鱼儿水中游,观看大自然中的一切,一切都显得那么有趣。似乎每一处有春天的味道都想去捕捉,每一个细节都想抓住。后来我渐渐爱上了写作,从生活中发现事物,记录事物。如今虽然过去很多年了,这节课的场景依然历历在目。相比之下,对那些在教室里上过的作文课的记忆却早已不在了。这个例子说明,我们去实地上作文课的话,学生会觉得在观察的过程中很有趣味性,因为学习的兴致更高。相信有许多人都有类似经历,上学的时候一听要去实地学习就会特别兴奋、兴质昂扬。所以说,与在教室学习相比,实地学习对孩子的教育更好。 有人认为与在教室学习比实地学习对孩子的教育更好。这是因为在教室学习学生更容易集中注意在课堂上,而在实地学习中学生容易分散。事实上,并没有数据表明在教室学习学生的注意力更容易集中,课堂注意力集中的情况往往和学生的年龄,以及老师上课的方式相关。如果上课的方式太过于沉闷,学生的注意力也无法长时间集中。相反,在实地学习的这种方式容易让学生们更加活跃,积极参与到课程之中。所以,实地学习更能激发学生的学习兴趣。 简单地说,实地学习有助于学生更好的理解所学知识,也更能激发他们的学习兴趣,带动学生的学习积极性,这些都有利于实现教育传播知识的目的,因而对孩子的教育更好。 As the nation’s economy soars, education plays a vital role all the time, nowadays, the Department of Education has attached great importance to the development of education. A large number of resources are put into a lot of projects in education, giving a boost to the reform in education. As always, the discussions relating to education are still on the lips of many individuals. For instance, which one is the better way to teach children, studying in the classroom or going on filed trips? Form my perspective, I prefer going on filed trips. Two reasons are as follows. First of all, going on filed trips contributes to a better understanding of what the students have learned. Students can only be provided with books and courseware when they study in classrooms. However, going on a filed trips produces a sizable impact on getting rid of limitations from learning environment, such as looking more closely at the information, obtaining the knowledge from different perspectives, which take an advantage of the better understanding of what students have learned. Take a composition lesson on the subject of spring breaks for example, teachers have an opportunity to lead the students to smell the roses and give the duty to record the entire sequence of events. Studying in the natural habitat, pupils are easier to generate the real feeling from nature. Not only can they observe the growth of plants and animals of filed trips, but also they may hold deep impressions of the overall processes, making them more accessible to write down the composition with the topic of spring walk by providing the authentic material. The way to finish the composition on filed trips is more vivid than in classrooms by books and imaginations, with more impressions. As a result, writing a good essay is more convenient and collected examples become more real. To sum up, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. Secondly, going on filed trips is better at stimulating students’ delight in knowledge. Interest is the best teacher, so goes the proverb. It is better to teach students by going on filed trips, which has an advantage of arousing students’ curiosity, than to impart knowledge in classrooms. In my memory, it was a composition class, the teacher took the classmates swim to the spring. We had a great time by the river side, with the butterflies dancing in the air and fish swimming in the water. The process of enjoying the nature made us quite interesting. It seemed that the flavor of spring was longed to be captured, every details had to be chased. I started to love writing, getting information from our life and recording everything. Many years have passed, I can still vividly recall this scene. On the contrary, the memories of the composition courses in the classroom are long gone. As we can see from the example, students can obtain more interesting experience from observation by going on filed trips to take the composition class, which contributes to the improvement of their interest in learning. I believe that many individuals have a similar experience, when told that they will go on filed trips, a cry of joy burst forth from the crowd. As a result, going on field trips is better for children’s education than staying in the classroom at school. There is a wide perception that learning in classrooms is better, compared with going on file trips. As a result of the point that studying in classrooms is easier to attract students’ attentions, going on filed trips gives students extra time to distract their focus. In fact, no statistics indicates that taking courses in classrooms has an advantage of paying attention to the knowledge, the focus on class is often intimately linked to the age of students and the way of teaching pupils. Students are unable to focus on the class for a long time with a young age and a tedious arrangement. On the contrary, going on filed trips makes students more active, they would like to involve in the lesson. Consequently, going on filed trips is easier to arouse students’ curiosity. To put it simply, going on filed trips gains a better understanding of what students have learned, and the way it also does better in stirring up students’ inquisitiveness about knowledge and stimulating children’s learning initiative, which have an advantage of spreading knowledge, as well as contributing to the children’s education.
As society develops, the increasing correlation between education and students’ personal success calls for improvement and innovation of education. Some who stick at traditional teaching methods insist on their students studying in the classroom, while other come up with a different kind of field trips. Personally, I think conducting field study may be better for students. Here are my reasons. First of all, field trips contribute to better understanding of the knowledge gained in class. Textbooks and handouts might be the only resources students could refer to if they just study indoors. Field study, removing the boundaries of classrooms, could allow students have a closer look at what they have learned in class. The appearance, sound, taste, texture and other aspects of an object could render a laudable service for students to get a better perception of it, and thus facilitate their learning. For instance, my history teacher who intended to teach us about the old ramparts in our city, took us to the suburb of Nanjing, where we watched and touched (got permissions already) the weathered stones. Standing on the old walls, we had a vivid knowledge of the structure and the materials they used. As we can see, field trips enable students to fell the authentic objects and to cultivate their insights. And no matter how graphical a picture in a book might be, it will never leave such a great impression on students. Thus, I believe that field trips are of greater significance as to study. Next, field trips are more likely to arouse students' curiosity of a subject. As the saying goes, interest is the best teacher. If field trips could stimulate students' delight in study, then field trips outweigh classroom learning. For instance, I have participated in a photography course and I found the theories of composition and color to be dull. One day our professor took us students to a garden with breath-taking landscapes. All of my classmates experimented with different camera settings to get the optimal image effect. Even when it was dark, we continued to try long exposures and light painting tirelessly. From then on, no classmates have played hooky or dozed off at class. As you can see, if students are given the chance to practice outdoors, they could gain hands-on experience and thus get inspired by the exploration. I guess most people may have the same experience. Therefore, I believe that, compared with studying in the classroom, field trips are better. Some people argue that studying in the classroom is better because students could concentrate on what they are learning when they stay in the classroom, and thus could learn systematically. In fact, students will fail to be absorbed if they feel bored, not to mention their solid grasp of knowledge. Admittedly, students will become too excited to think straight during field trips, but this problem could be solved if their teachers could guide them right there. In conclusion, field study, with its efficiency of maintaining students' interest and facilitating their absorption of knowledge, outshines in-class teaching method. Thus, I believe it is better for students.
An old Chinese saying goes, 'It takes ten years to grow trees but a hundred years to rear people '.With the remarkable progress of the society, enormous changes have occurred in the field of education. There has historically been plentiful of debate about education. For example, which has better influence on children, in terms of field trips or classroom teaching. Personally speaking, it is more reasonable to choose to learn things in the real situation. My reasons and examples are given bellow. First of all, field trips contributes to students' good understanding of knowledge. Teaching in the classroom imparts the knowledge through the simple method, including the book and video. But if they can learn it in the real scene, students can overcome the limitation of the classroom to observe the objects themselves. It can deepen the understanding of the knowledge of smell, touching, sound or appearance more than reading from books. For example, if they can have history class in the museum or memorial, children will learn more aspects of that period of history from the showed historical relics and pictures. Museums with various ages and themes cannot only give the information in different points of view, but also increasing the interest of students who have less attention to the history class. That is to say field trip teaching has more advantages than the classroom teaching. Secondary, field trip teaching is better at stimulating students' delight in knowledge. There goes that interest is the best teacher. If field trips can do better in stirring up kids' inquisitiveness, it is admitted that it's a better scholastic method. As my recollection, we went to Anti Japanese Memorial Hall in a history class. We really felt we were in that battle by looking at the gun the soldiers used and the articles for their daily use. Plus, we experienced the 3D-simulated war game which touches us greatly about the ruthless of war to educate us to cherish the peace. This class arouse my curiosity of history to a large extend. The interest to study is well raised up by field trips are proved in such example. Therefore, it is more crucial for students to learn from field trips rather than the classroom. Some people believe that classroom education does better than field trips. Since they may too excited about the objects observed or activities attended, students are most likely to forget the core aim of gaining knowledge. However, it is of such interest in attracting them that can help them to remember the process of leading them to review the information themselves after class. Field trips teaching, which benefits more to kids, has more incomparable merits. In short, field trips teaching helps students to gain a better understanding of knowledge. Plus, it is better at stimulating students' delight in information of books to drive learning initiative. All of above benefit the achievement of aim of imparting knowledge, which is confirmed good for kids' development.
It is said that education is the foundation of the long-term.With the remarkable progressive of society, people pay more attention and spend more on education,which make the way of education innovation and reformed constantly. All the time, there are a great number of debates in society on the way -- staying in the classroom and going field trips which does better to students. As for me , I believe that field trips are preferable. My reasons and examples are followed. To begin with, going on field trips is conducive to students' understanding of what have learnt. If students study in the classroom, they just depend on textbooks or ppts. Nevertheless, students can get rid of the constraint of classroom to observe things they learnt in field trips. By means of olfactory, vision, auditory and touch, pupils will have a comprehensive cognition of what they learnt rather than stopping over books, which can acquire a deep understanding. For example, In a biology class, the teacher wants to teach pupils variety of plants , If this class is in the outside or plantation, students can not only observe the looking of these plants in the nature but also smell these plants and compare its different habitats by contacting plants. This field trips more vivid than traditional learning and can make students have a deeper impression so they can sharpen understanding. In brief, compared to staying in the class, going on field trips is more vigorous. 理由二 不见了...... Some hold the opinion that studying in the class does better than goning field trips since that field trips may occur some accidents and there is no guarantee that every student can follow the teacher rather than playing nearby. So they believe that studying in the class is the best way for students because it's safe and teachers can observe which students doesn't attend class distinctly. Actually, there is no data pointing that learning in the claa is definite safety.and even if students sit in the classroom, they may hard concentrate on what teachers have taught. However, going field trips have some advantages such as arousing students' curiosity and deepening understanding, which studying in the classroom doesn't have. As far as I am concerned, field trips do better in students. In briefly, going on field trips contributes to students to deeped understanding and stimulating their curiosity and initiate, which are benefit to the goal that education delivers knowledge. So field trips are greater.

请选择发起聊天的方式:

安装 QQ